For one time, while we are in a congratulations tunnel, thank you a lot
AsyncIO core devs:
Since several months, we've pushed on production an average of 2 daemons
based on AsyncIO in my company with several protocols.
Most of the time there are small daemons, however, some are complex.
For now, t
Hi,
2015-06-25 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andrew Svetlov :
> P.S.
> Thank you Victor so much for your work on asyncio.
> Your changes on keeping source tracebacks and raising warnings for
> unclosed resources are very helpful.
Ah! It's good to know. You're welcome.
We can still enhance the source traceback
I'm with Victor: we are in beta now.
Making C API is useful and important but we may wait for new Python release.
The same for asycnio acceleration: we definitely need it but it
requires inviting C API also I believe.
Personally I've concentrated on making third-party libraries on top of
asyncio
It looks like the code is currently moving fast. I suggest to wait
until Python 3.6 to stabilize the Python C API for async/await. It's a
pain to maintain a public API. I hate having to add 2 or 3 versions of
a single function :-(
Victor
2015-06-25 17:43 GMT+02:00 Yury Selivanov :
> Hi Arc,
>
>
>
Hi Arc,
On 2015-06-24 10:36 PM, Arc Riley wrote:
A type slot for tp_as_async has already been added (which is good!) but we
do not currently seem to have protocol functions for awaitable types.
I would expect to find an Awaitable Protocol listed under Abstract Objects
Layer, with functions like
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>
>
> I'd wait with that a bit, though, until after Py3.5 is finally released
> and the actual needs for C code that want to use the new
> features become clearer.
>
I strongly disagree.
What we would end up with is 3rd party extension module
Arc Riley schrieb am 25.06.2015 um 04:36:
> A type slot for tp_as_async has already been added (which is good!) but we
> do not currently seem to have protocol functions for awaitable types.
>
> I would expect to find an Awaitable Protocol listed under Abstract Objects
> Layer, with functions like
A type slot for tp_as_async has already been added (which is good!) but we
do not currently seem to have protocol functions for awaitable types.
I would expect to find an Awaitable Protocol listed under Abstract Objects
Layer, with functions like PyAwait_Check, PyAwaitIter_Check, and
PyAwaitIter_N
