Nick Coghlan wrote:
> With PEP 344, this could simply be:
>
>try:
>parser.parseFile(file)
>exeption Exception, exception:
>raise type(exception)("Error at line %s in file %s" % (x,y))
>
> Introspectively,
> Nick.
>
It doesn't work (unless I misundertand you). For exampl
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> With PEP 344, this could simply be:
>
>try:
>parser.parseFile(file)
>exeption Exception, exception:
>raise type(exception)("Error at line %s in file %s" % (x,y))
Only if we also made all exceptions new-style classes.
That's just a
Nicolas Fleury wrote:
> I do a lot of exception re-raising at work; I use that
> technique to add content to exception messages while
> keeping the original stack. I even created a reraise
> function that I use that way:
>
> try:
> parser.parseFile(file)
> exeption Exception, exception:
>
Sorry if this message is not a direct reply to Ka-Ping
Yee message on PEP344, I'm in vacation in China and
there's a thing I must say that could make sense in
PEP344.
I do a lot of exception re-raising at work; I use that
technique to add content to exception messages while
keeping the original s
