Re: [Python-Dev] Adding new features to Python 2.x (PEP 382: Namespace Packages)

2009-04-09 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Aahz wrote: > On Thu, Apr 09, 2009, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> >> Martin v. L?wis wrote: Such a policy would then translate to a dead end for Python 2.x based applications. >>> >>> 2.x based applications *are* in a dead end, with the only exit >>> being portag

Re: [Python-Dev] Adding new features to Python 2.x (PEP 382: Namespace Packages)

2009-04-09 Thread Nick Coghlan
Aahz wrote: > On Thu, Apr 09, 2009, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> Martin v. L?wis wrote: Such a policy would then translate to a dead end for Python 2.x based applications. >>> 2.x based applications *are* in a dead end, with the only exit >>> being portage to 3.x. >> The actual end of the dead

Re: [Python-Dev] Adding new features to Python 2.x (PEP 382: Namespace Packages)

2009-04-09 Thread Aahz
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > Martin v. L?wis wrote: >>> Such a policy would then translate to a dead end for Python 2.x >>> based applications. >> >> 2.x based applications *are* in a dead end, with the only exit >> being portage to 3.x. > > The actual end of the dead end just ha

Re: [Python-Dev] Adding new features to Python 2.x (PEP 382: Namespace Packages)

2009-04-09 Thread Nick Coghlan
Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> Such a policy would then translate to a dead end for Python 2.x >> based applications. > > 2.x based applications *are* in a dead end, with the only exit > being portage to 3.x. The actual end of the dead end just happens to be in 2013 or so :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick C

Re: [Python-Dev] Adding new features to Python 2.x (PEP 382: Namespace Packages)

2009-04-07 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Such a policy would then translate to a dead end for Python 2.x > based applications. 2.x based applications *are* in a dead end, with the only exit being portage to 3.x. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.py

Re: [Python-Dev] Adding new features to Python 2.x (PEP 382: Namespace Packages)

2009-04-07 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:25 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > On 2009-04-06 15:21, Jesse Noller wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:33 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >>> On 2009-04-02 17:32, Martin v. Löwis wrote: I propose the following PEP for inclusion to Python 3.1. >>> Thanks for picking this up. >>>

Re: [Python-Dev] Adding new features to Python 2.x (PEP 382: Namespace Packages)

2009-04-07 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 2009-04-06 15:21, Jesse Noller wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:33 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> On 2009-04-02 17:32, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> I propose the following PEP for inclusion to Python 3.1. >> Thanks for picking this up. >> >> I'd like to extend the proposal to Python 2.7 and later.