Tennessee Leeuwenburg tleeuwenburg at gmail.com writes:
Hi all,I am beginning reviewing some more issues in the tracker. I think it
would be useful to have the following status options (new status options marked
with a '+'):
I have to point out that the more alternatives there are to choose
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 22:39, Tennessee Leeuwenburg
tleeuwenb...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't mind what approach is taken -- I'm happy to work within the
current infrastructure if someone can suggest a good way. I really just want
to be able to start distinguishing between issues that are
Brett Cannon wrote:
If we can come up with a simple solution to this problem (perhaps have
issues set to under development with no activity shift down a status
level after a month) then maybe we will have something everyone can be
happy with.
If an issue is assigned, then somebody has claimed
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 15:33, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Brett Cannon wrote:
If we can come up with a simple solution to this problem (perhaps have
issues set to under development with no activity shift down a status
level after a month) then maybe we will have something
[adding python-dev back on to the email]
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 15:51, Tennessee Leeuwenburg tleeuwenb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Pretty much. I've got two views. One is that I'd like to search for
issues that are up for grabs which I could take over, hack on, and generally
not get underfoot of
Hi all,
I am beginning reviewing some more issues in the tracker. I think it would
be useful to have the following status options (new status options marked
with a '+'):
Open: Means that the issue has been created and not further reviewed
+ Request Approved: Means that the issue is marked as
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 20:25, Tennessee Leeuwenburg
tleeuwenb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am beginning reviewing some more issues in the tracker. I think it would
be useful to have the following status options (new
Hi Tennessee,
I plan to take a look at all open issues before PyCon, do you want to
join forces? :)
Tennessee Leeuwenburg wrote:
I am beginning reviewing some more issues in the tracker. I think it would
be useful to have the following status options (new status options marked
with a '+'):
Brett Cannon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 20:25, Tennessee Leeuwenburg
tleeuwenb...@gmail.com mailto:tleeuwenb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am beginning reviewing some more issues in the tracker. I think it
would be useful to have the following status options (new status
Terry Reedy wrote:
The other problem with too many specifics is non-use. As it is, an issue is
sometimes closed with no resolution marked, so one has to scroll down,
possibly a long way, to see whether it was accepted or rejected. (Is it
possible to require a resolution when closing?)
Yes,
I don't mind what approach is taken -- I'm happy to work within the
current infrastructure if someone can suggest a good way. I really just want
to be able to start distinguishing between issues that are essentially new
and under debate versus issues that most people agree are a Good Thing
11 matches
Mail list logo
