On Jan 18, 2006, at 8:24 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
The import of the Ghostscript case is that the FSF considers a
Makefile stanza clearly intended to cause linkage to a GPL library,
even if optional and supplied by the user, to create a work derived
from that library. A GNU
On Jan 21, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
In that case, what I think we ought to do is not add the DP paths
(i.e. /opt/local) to setup.py specifically to get its readline, but
instead to pick up any libraries that happen to be in DP in
preference to those in OSX by default. If that
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:25:03PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Anthony It sounds like configure needs to grow a test to detect
Anthony that a libreadline it finds is actually the crackful
Anthony libedit and refuse to use it if so.
FYI: Real libreadline is GPL, and rms made
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 16:25, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Unless rms has changed his position on this, or there has been
relevant legislation or a court decision in the meantime,
explicitly requiring or checking for real libreadline, even as a
user option, risks rms's wrath. (Of course,
Anthony == Anthony Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anthony Python's license is GPL-compatible, so this isn't an
Anthony issue.
I'm sorry, but you seem to misunderstand what GPL compatibility
means. It is a _one-way_ street. A license is GPL-compatible if its
terms permit the code it
On 1/17/06, Stephen J. Turnbull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony == Anthony Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anthony It sounds like configure needs to grow a test to detect
Anthony that a libreadline it finds is actually the crackful
Anthony libedit and refuse to use it if so.
Anthony It sounds like configure needs to grow a test to detect that a
Anthony libreadline it finds is actually the crackful libedit and
Anthony refuse to use it if so.
FYI: Real libreadline is GPL, ...
Didn't Python's readline module work with libedit once upon a time? I
On Jan 18, 2006, at 1:31 AM, Anthony Baxter wrote:
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 16:25, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Unless rms has changed his position on this, or there has been
relevant legislation or a court decision in the meantime,
explicitly requiring or checking for real libreadline,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Can we just all agree that RMS is an asshole now? Bah.
Citing RMS's insanity is a great way to get my blood steaming. --GvR
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * http://www.pythoncraft.com/
19. A language that doesn't affect the way you
On Jan 18, 2006, at 11:40 PM, Aahz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Can we just all agree that RMS is an asshole now? Bah.
Citing RMS's insanity is a great way to get my blood steaming. --
GvR
Ya know, you don't *have* to use his software. For example, python
could
On Jan 18, 2006, at 8:47 PM, James Y Knight wrote:
On Jan 18, 2006, at 11:40 PM, Aahz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Can we just all agree that RMS is an asshole now? Bah.
Citing RMS's insanity is a great way to get my blood steaming. --
GvR
Ya know, you don't
On Jan 18, 2006, at 8:47 PM, James Y Knight wrote:
On Jan 18, 2006, at 11:40 PM, Aahz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Can we just all agree that RMS is an asshole now? Bah.
Citing RMS's insanity is a great way to get my blood steaming. --
GvR
Ya know, you don't
Building the readline on OS X 10.4 fails, is this known, or am I doing
something wrong?
Thanks,
Thomas
building 'readline' extension
gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -Wno-long-double -no-cpp-precomp -mno-fused-madd
-DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -I.
-I/Users/theller/svn/trunk/./Include
On Jan 17, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Thomas Heller wrote:
Building the readline on OS X 10.4 fails, is this known, or am I doing
something wrong?
Mac OS X doesn't ship with readline. It ships with BSD libedit
symlinked to readline. Not good enough for Python. You need a third
party copy.
I
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 19:17 +0100, Thomas Heller wrote:
Building the readline on OS X 10.4 fails, is this known, or am I doing
something wrong?
There are definitely serious issues with readline on OS X 10.4. I've
hit them too but haven't had time to post about it yet. I'm far from an
expert
On 1/17/06, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 19:17 +0100, Thomas Heller wrote:
Building the readline on OS X 10.4 fails, is this known, or am I doing
something wrong?
There are definitely serious issues with readline on OS X 10.4. I've
hit them too but haven't
On Jan 17, 2006, at 4:17 PM, Anthony Baxter wrote:
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 06:19, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 19:17 +0100, Thomas Heller wrote:
Building the readline on OS X 10.4 fails, is this known, or am I
doing something wrong?
There are definitely serious issues
Anthony == Anthony Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anthony It sounds like configure needs to grow a test to detect
Anthony that a libreadline it finds is actually the crackful
Anthony libedit and refuse to use it if so.
FYI: Real libreadline is GPL, and rms made a point of forcing
18 matches
Mail list logo
