Hi Stefan,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Any reason you didn't write the C parts in Cython?
'''As a general rule, when there is a design issue to resolve, we pick
the solution that is the “most C-like”.''' (from the documentation).
But you are welcome to write Cython bi
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Is there any provision for keeping the compiled
> C code and distributing it along with an application?
> Requiring a C compiler to be present at all times
> could be a difficulty for Windows.
We are aware of it and doing that is work
Is there any provision for keeping the compiled
C code and distributing it along with an application?
Requiring a C compiler to be present at all times
could be a difficulty for Windows.
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://m
Armin Rigo, 18.06.2012 23:29:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>> Make cffi less buggy (check the tracker for new test cases ;-), faster
>>> (closer to swig type wrappers), and easier to use than ctypes, and I am sure
>>> there will be interest.
>>
>> I would say it's a
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Yes, because languages have no speed, only implementations do; and yes,
> because when CPython really is too slow for a particular task, it can be
> pushed onto C. But some people (pygame, others on python-list) have reported
> that for their
On 6/18/2012 5:29 PM, Armin Rigo wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> Me
Make cffi less buggy (check the tracker for new test cases ;-), faster
(closer to swig type wrappers), and easier to use than ctypes, and I am sure
there will be interest.
I would say it'
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> Make cffi less buggy (check the tracker for new test cases ;-), faster
>> (closer to swig type wrappers), and easier to use than ctypes, and I am sure
>> there will be interest.
>
> I would say it's already fulfilling those three,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 6/18/2012 9:14 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We (=fijal and myself) finally released the beta-0.1 version of CFFI.
>>
>> http://cffi.readthedocs.org/
>>
>> It is a(nother) simple Foreign Function Interface for Python calling C
>>
On 6/18/2012 9:14 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi all,
We (=fijal and myself) finally released the beta-0.1 version of CFFI.
http://cffi.readthedocs.org/
It is a(nother) simple Foreign Function Interface for Python calling C
code. I talked about it with a few python core people during the
PyCon spri
Hi all,
We (=fijal and myself) finally released the beta-0.1 version of CFFI.
http://cffi.readthedocs.org/
It is a(nother) simple Foreign Function Interface for Python calling C
code. I talked about it with a few python core people during the
PyCon sprint; now it's done, with a pure Python part
10 matches
Mail list logo
