On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Reid Kleckner r...@mit.edu wrote:
I don't think this will help you solve your problem, but one thing
we've done in unladen swallow is to hack PyType_Modified to invalidate
our own descriptor caches. We may eventually want to extend that into
a callback
2010/3/3 Daniel Stutzbach dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com:
I think I see a way to dramatically speed up PyObject_RichCompareBool when
comparing immutable, built-in, non-container objects (int, float, str,
etc.). It would speed up list.sort when the key is one of those types, as
well as most
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.orgwrote:
2010/3/3 Daniel Stutzbach dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com:
I think I see a way to dramatically speed up PyObject_RichCompareBool
when
comparing immutable, built-in, non-container objects (int, float, str,
etc.).
Hey Daniel,
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Daniel Stutzbach
dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Reid Kleckner r...@mit.edu wrote:
I don't think this will help you solve your problem, but one thing
we've done in unladen swallow is to hack PyType_Modified to
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Collin Winter collinwin...@google.comwrote:
I would recommend patching py3k, with a backport to trunk.
After thinking it over, I'm inclined to patch trunk, so I can run the
Unladen Swallow macro-benchmarks, then forward-port to py3k.
I'm correct in
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Daniel Stutzbach
dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Collin Winter collinwin...@google.com
wrote:
I would recommend patching py3k, with a backport to trunk.
After thinking it over, I'm inclined to patch trunk, so I can run
In CPython, is it safe to cache function pointers that are in type objects?
For example, if I know that some_type-tp_richcompare is non-NULL, and I
call it (which may execute arbitrary user code), can I assume that
some_type-tp_richcompare is still non-NULL?
--
Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D.
President,
2010/3/2 Daniel Stutzbach dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com:
In CPython, is it safe to cache function pointers that are in type objects?
For example, if I know that some_type-tp_richcompare is non-NULL, and I
call it (which may execute arbitrary user code), can I assume that
I don't think this will help you solve your problem, but one thing
we've done in unladen swallow is to hack PyType_Modified to invalidate
our own descriptor caches. We may eventually want to extend that into
a callback interface, but it probably will never be considered an API
that outside code
