On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:46 PM Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev
wrote:
>
> If the use case for stability is only .pyc compilation, I doubt it's even
> relevant 'cuz .pyc's are supposed to be compiled in isolation from other
> current objects (otherwise, they wouldn't be reusable or would be invalid
t;mailto:sdamon@python.org>> On Behalf Of
Victor Stinner
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 4:01 AM
> To: Serhiy Storchaka mailto:storch...@gmail.com>>
> Cc: python-dev mailto:python-dev@python.org>>
> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Can I make marshal
Stinner
> > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 4:01 AM
> > To: Serhiy Storchaka mailto:storch...@gmail.com>>
> > Cc: python-dev mailto:python-dev@python.org>>
> > Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Can I make marshal.dumps() slower but stabler?
> >
>
On Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2018 22:09:41 CEST Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:03:30 +0200
>
> André Malo wrote:
> > * INADA Naoki wrote:
> > > Is there any real application which marshal.dumps() performance is
> > > critical?
> >
> > I'm using it for spooling big chunks of data on di
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 5:03 AM André Malo wrote:
>
> * INADA Naoki wrote:
>
> > Is there any real application which marshal.dumps() performance is
> > critical?
>
> I'm using it for spooling big chunks of data on disk, exactly for the reason
> that it's faster than pickle.
>
> Cheers,
Does your
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:03:30 +0200
André Malo wrote:
> * INADA Naoki wrote:
>
> > Is there any real application which marshal.dumps() performance is
> > critical?
>
> I'm using it for spooling big chunks of data on disk, exactly for the reason
> that it's faster than pickle.
Which kind of da
* INADA Naoki wrote:
> Is there any real application which marshal.dumps() performance is
> critical?
I'm using it for spooling big chunks of data on disk, exactly for the reason
that it's faster than pickle.
Cheers,
--
"Das Verhalten von Gates hatte mir bewiesen, dass ich auf ihn und seine
be
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:21:55 +0300
Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>
> > Is there any real application which marshal.dumps() performance is
> > critical?
> EVE Online is a well known example.
>
> What if write a script which loads .pyc files and stabilize them? This
> could solve the problem for app
To: Serhiy Storchaka
> > Cc: python-dev
> > Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Can I make marshal.dumps() slower but stabler?
> >
> > 2018-07-12 8:21 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka :
> > >> Is there any real application which marshal.dumps() performance is
> > >&
> -Original Message-
> From: Python-Dev list=sdamon@python.org> On Behalf Of Victor Stinner
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 4:01 AM
> To: Serhiy Storchaka
> Cc: python-dev
> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Can I make marshal.dumps() slower but stabler?
>
>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 3:22 PM Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>
> 12.07.18 08:43, INADA Naoki пише:
> > I'm working on making pyc stable, via stablizing marshal.dumps()
> > https://bugs.python.org/issue34093
>
> This is not enough for making pyc stable. The order in frozesets still
> is arbitrary.
But
2018-07-12 8:21 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka :
>> Is there any real application which marshal.dumps() performance is
>> critical?
>
> EVE Online is a well known example.
EVE Online has been created in 2003. I guess that it still uses Python 2.7.
I'm not sure that a video game would pick marshal in
12.07.18 08:43, INADA Naoki пише:
I'm working on making pyc stable, via stablizing marshal.dumps()
https://bugs.python.org/issue34093
This is not enough for making pyc stable. The order in frozesets still
is arbitrary.
Sadly, it makes marshal.dumps() 40% slower.
Luckily, this overhead is sm
I'm working on making pyc stable, via stablizing marshal.dumps()
https://bugs.python.org/issue34093
Sadly, it makes marshal.dumps() 40% slower.
Luckily, this overhead is small (only 4%) for dumps(compile(source)) case.
So my question is: May I remove unstable but faster code?
Or should I make t
14 matches
Mail list logo
