On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
for base in bases:
for name in getattr(base, __abstractmethods__, ()):
# CHANGE 4: Using rpartition better tolerates weird
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you think about deprecating
abstractproperty, or removing it from the documentation?
Unless anyone specifically howls at the idea, +1 to both (since
abstractproperty doesn't actually achieve the intended purpose and
I would like to try to address some shortfalls with the way python deals with
abstract base classes containing descriptors. I originally was just concerned
with improving support for defining abstract properties with the decorator
syntax and converting between abstract and concrete properties, but
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip excellent analysis of the problem]
I have some suggestions regarding a few details of your current code,
but your basic proposal looks sound to me.
I would tweak __new__ along the following lines though:
def
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip excellent analysis of the problem]
I have some suggestions regarding a few details of your current code,
but your basic proposal looks sound to
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
That should be get_abstract_names(namespace), since ns.items() gets
called again in the for loop. I think the get_abstract_names function
isn't needed though, since it is only ever called that one time. Any
reason not
