Hi,
First of all let me say that I agree with the aims of PEP 558 and most
of the design.
I do find the wording of the PEP itself a bit confusing in a couple of
places.
This critique is based on my understanding of the PEP.
If I am mistaken in my misunderstanding, then treat that as an implie
Hi Nick,
Regarding `f_locals` PEP 558 states:
"""
Instead of being a direct reference to the internal dynamic snapshot
used to populate the independent snapshots returned by locals(),
frame.f_locals will be updated to instead return a dedicated proxy type
(implemented as a private subclass
Hi,
First of all I want to say that I'm very much in favour of the general
idea behind PEP 558. Defined semantics is always better than undefined
semantics :)
However, I think there are a few changes needed:
1. Don't add anything to the C API, please.
Frame attributes can be accessed via
