On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:22:44PM +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 12.01.14 18:39, schrieb Nachshon David Armon:
> >>> I propose that this new version of python use the python 3 unicode model.
> >>> As the version of python will be fully compatible with both python 2 and
> >>> with python 3 bu
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 09:25:04AM -0500, Eric V. Smith wrote:
> On 1/15/2014 8:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:22 PM, "Martin v. Löwis"
> > wrote:
> >> I don't think that it is possible to write an interpreter that is fully
> >> compatible for all it accepts. Would yo
15.01.14 16:34, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла):
If you explicitly create a long the L will always be printed:
long(0)
0L
Hey! long is not in common subset of Python 2 and Python 3.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
>> Easiest fix for that would be to have long.__repr__ omit the L tag.
>> Then it'll do the same as it would in Py3.
>
> I think Martin's point is not this specific thing, but that such a
> subset would be useless. Would you drop dict.items() b
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:31:17 +0200
Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 15.01.14 14:22, "Martin v. Löwis" написав(ла):
> > I don't think that it is possible to write an interpreter that is fully
> > compatible for all it accepts. Would you think that the program
> >
> > print(repr(2**80).endswith("L"))
> >
>
15.01.14 14:22, "Martin v. Löwis" написав(ла):
I don't think that it is possible to write an interpreter that is fully
compatible for all it accepts. Would you think that the program
print(repr(2**80).endswith("L"))
is in the subset that should be supported by both Python 2 and Python 3?
Notic
On 1/15/2014 8:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:22 PM, "Martin v. Löwis"
> wrote:
>> I don't think that it is possible to write an interpreter that is fully
>> compatible for all it accepts. Would you think that the program
>>
>> print(repr(2**80).endswith("L"))
>>
>> is
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:22 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> I don't think that it is possible to write an interpreter that is fully
> compatible for all it accepts. Would you think that the program
>
> print(repr(2**80).endswith("L"))
>
> is in the subset that should be supported by both Python 2
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:22:44 +0100
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 12.01.14 18:39, schrieb Nachshon David Armon:
> >>> I propose that this new version of python use the python 3 unicode model.
> >>> As the version of python will be fully compatible with both python 2 and
> >>> with python 3 but NOT
Am 12.01.14 18:39, schrieb Nachshon David Armon:
>>> I propose that this new version of python use the python 3 unicode model.
>>> As the version of python will be fully compatible with both python 2 and
>>> with python 3 but NOT necsesarily with all existing code in either. It is
>>> designed as a
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> On 12 Jan 2014 23:39, "Nachshon David Armon"
> wrote:
>>
>> I propose that this new version of python use the python 3 unicode model.
>> As the version of python will be fully compatible with both python 2 and
>> with python 3 but NOT necs
On 12 Jan 2014 23:39, "Nachshon David Armon"
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am Nachshon and this is my first post to the python mailing list.
>
> I have been porting some libraries from python 2 to python 3 recently
with the goal of a common codebase that will run on both versions. I was
thinking it would mak
Hi Nachson,
Python 2.7 with the -3 warning flag covers most of this, while using tox to
run automated tests under both 2.x and 3.x should cover the rest (tox is
also useful for checking code runs under Python 2.6, even if you normally
use a newer version).
Is there anything in particular you feel
Hi,
I am Nachshon and this is my first post to the python mailing list.
I have been porting some libraries from python 2 to python 3 recently with
the goal of a common codebase that will run on both versions. I was
thinking it would make my life, and a lot of other developers as well, a
lot easier
14 matches
Mail list logo
