Michael Chermside wrote:
> (PS: too bad I can't buy stock in Coverity. How come all the GOOD
> companies are private? I had to wait around 6 years before I could
> buy stock in Google.)
Maybe because the companies whose stock is available early are companies
bent on producing stock profits, rather
Dennis Allison writes:
> I'd also encourage Coventry to explain their business model a bit more
> clearly.
Ben Chelf writes:
> Of course it's no surprise that I see open
> source projects everywhere -- as part of infrastructure or part of code
> bases that people are developing. So from a Coverity
On 3/7/06, Ben Chelf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Putting on my idealistic hat and remembering back my grad school days, Ithink we're on to something very new in the world of source codeanalysis. I really just want every developer to use source code analysiswhile they write code (remember, idealistic
> The Coverty marketing droids need to be a bit less anal about getting
> people to register at the website. IMHO, the technology should be
Honestly, I laughed out loud when I read this. ;) So thanks for that.
>
> I'd also encourage Coventry to explain their business model a bit more
> clearl
On 3/6/06, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/6/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Didn't we set up a "security swat team" some time ago? If not, we
> > > should. Regardless, since I have more free time these days, I'd like
> > > to be on it.
> >
> > Yep, it's c
FWIW, coverity has been busy marketing this already:
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/84465/key-opensource-code-passes-muster.html
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 14:26 -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
> > [Ben Chelf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> > > ...
> > > I'd ask that if you are interested in really digging into the results a
> > > bit
> > > further for your project, please have a couple of core maintai
[Barry]
> Yep, it's called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with a semi-secret backing mailing
> list, which I'd be happy for you to join!).
If guessing the right Mailman URL was the semi-secret test, I passed :-)
> I definitely think that group of folks at the least should review the results.
Yup!
_
On 3/6/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Didn't we set up a "security swat team" some time ago? If not, we> should. Regardless, since I have more free time these days, I'd like> to be on it.Yep, it's called
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (with a semi-secret backing mailinglist, which I'd be happy
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 14:26 -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
> [Ben Chelf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> > ...
> > I'd ask that if you are interested in really digging into the results a bit
> > further for your project, please have a couple of core maintainers (or
> > group nominated individuals) reach out to me
[Ben Chelf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> ...
> I'd ask that if you are interested in really digging into the results a bit
> further for your project, please have a couple of core maintainers (or
> group nominated individuals) reach out to me to request access.
Didn't we set up a "security swat team" som
Hello Python Developers,
I'm the CTO of Coverity, Inc., a company that does static source code
analysis to look for defects in code. You may have heard of us or of our
technology from its days at Stanford (the "Stanford Checker"). The
reason I'm writing is because we have set up a framework
12 matches
Mail list logo
