On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> 2016-01-21 18:18 GMT+01:00 Brett Cannon :
>> It's live: https://docs.python.org/devguide/#status-of-python-branches
>
> There is a very strange bug in this website.
>
> This URL shows the table:
> https://docs.python.org/devguide/
>
> This U
2016-01-21 18:18 GMT+01:00 Brett Cannon :
> It's live: https://docs.python.org/devguide/#status-of-python-branches
There is a very strange bug in this website.
This URL shows the table:
https://docs.python.org/devguide/
This URL doesn't show the table:
https://docs.python.org/devguide/index.html
2016-01-21 19:42 GMT+01:00 Paul Moore :
> Minor nit, the status column says "end of life", but the text below
> the table uses the term "end of line"
Ooops, it's a funny typo. Fixed. Thanks for the report!
Victor
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@p
On 22 January 2016 at 07:27, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 1/21/2016 10:42 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>
>> On 21 January 2016 at 17:18, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>>
>>> It's live: https://docs.python.org/devguide/#status-of-python-branches
>>
>> Nice :-)
>>
>> Minor nit, the status column says "end of lif
Emile van Sebille writes:
> I'd prefer end-of-support -- bet you can't count how many pre 2.5
> installations are still live.
I see your point, but (having just been thinking about CLAs and
Schneier's blog) have to suggest that software that has an explicit
"security support" period and is in
On 1/21/2016 10:42 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On 21 January 2016 at 17:18, Brett Cannon wrote:
It's live: https://docs.python.org/devguide/#status-of-python-branches
Nice :-)
Minor nit, the status column says "end of life", but the text below
the table uses the term "end of line" (as does the com
On 21 January 2016 at 17:18, Brett Cannon wrote:
> It's live: https://docs.python.org/devguide/#status-of-python-branches
Nice :-)
Minor nit, the status column says "end of life", but the text below
the table uses the term "end of line" (as does the comment "Versions
older than 2.6 reached their
Thanks Victor for doing this. I'm starting a campaign to tell people about
it on Twitter. :-)
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> It's live: https://docs.python.org/devguide/#status-of-python-branches
>
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 23:47 Victor Stinner
> wrote:
>
>> 2016-01-20 22
It's live: https://docs.python.org/devguide/#status-of-python-branches
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 23:47 Victor Stinner
wrote:
> 2016-01-20 22:22 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner :
> > I pushed my table, it will be online in a few hours (I don't know when
> > the devguide is recompiled?):
> >
> http://docs.p
2016-01-20 22:22 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner :
> I pushed my table, it will be online in a few hours (I don't know when
> the devguide is recompiled?):
> http://docs.python.org/devguide/triaging.html#generating-special-links-in-a-comment
Hum ok, it takes more than a few hours in fact. It's still not
2016-01-21 1:09 GMT+01:00 Brett Cannon :
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 14:28 Victor Stinner
>> I'm using the free service ReadTheDocs.org and it's really impressive
>> how fast it is to update the HTML page after a push. It's usually less
>> than 10 seconds.
>
> I have no idea if the way our docs are b
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 14:28 Victor Stinner
wrote:
> 2016-01-20 23:01 GMT+01:00 Brett Cannon :
> > This is a proposed optional, future feature leading from moving to
> GitHub:
> >
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0512/#web-hooks-for-re-generating-web-content
>
> I'm using the free service Re
2016-01-20 23:01 GMT+01:00 Brett Cannon :
> This is a proposed optional, future feature leading from moving to GitHub:
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0512/#web-hooks-for-re-generating-web-content
I'm using the free service ReadTheDocs.org and it's really impressive
how fast it is to update
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 13:22 Victor Stinner
wrote:
> I pushed my table, it will be online in a few hours (I don't know when
> the devguide is recompiled?):
>
> http://docs.python.org/devguide/triaging.html#generating-special-links-in-a-comment
>
> By the way, it would be super cool to rebuild the
I pushed my table, it will be online in a few hours (I don't know when
the devguide is recompiled?):
http://docs.python.org/devguide/triaging.html#generating-special-links-in-a-comment
By the way, it would be super cool to rebuild the PEPs with a
post-commit hook server-side, rather than having to
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 10:40 Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 1/20/2016 12:40 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I proposed a patch for the devguide to give the current status of all
> > Python branches: active, bugfix, security only, end-of-line, with
> > their end-of-life when applicable (past da
On 1/20/2016 12:40 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I proposed a patch for the devguide to give the current status of all
Python branches: active, bugfix, security only, end-of-line, with
their end-of-life when applicable (past date or scheduled date)
http://bugs.python.org/issue26165
What do you
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 09:41 Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I proposed a patch for the devguide to give the current status of all
> Python branches: active, bugfix, security only, end-of-line, with
> their end-of-life when applicable (past date or scheduled date)
> http://bugs.python.org/issue26
Hi,
I proposed a patch for the devguide to give the current status of all
Python branches: active, bugfix, security only, end-of-line, with
their end-of-life when applicable (past date or scheduled date)
http://bugs.python.org/issue26165
What do you think? Does it look correct?
We will have to u
19 matches
Mail list logo
