While this is going to require a PEP (which I am willing to write),
the discussion of adding pysqlite has brought forth some discussion on
naming and packaging in the stdlub. Perhaps it's time to start
discussing the Great Library Reorganization that has been discussed
for eons.
Here is a place
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brett Cannon wrote:
While this is going to require a PEP (which I am willing to write),
the discussion of adding pysqlite has brought forth some discussion on
naming and packaging in the stdlub. Perhaps it's time to start
discussing the Great
On 3/29/06, Gerhard Häring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brett Cannon wrote:
While this is going to require a PEP (which I am willing to write),
the discussion of adding pysqlite has brought forth some discussion on
naming and packaging in the
Not quite on the same topic, but perhaps it belong there. I think most of
use use both the stdlib and some selection of other libraries
(MySQL-Python, ReportLab Toolkit, PyChart, and PyXML, for example). These
libraries have to be managed independently and installed independently.
It would be
Brett Cannon wrote:
Wouldn't the newly founded python-3000 mailing list be the perfect place
for such major changes?
If you go back and look at Guido's Python 3000 Process email he said
that the change could occur in 2.6 and then be done for 3000.
Renaming modules is not that hard to make
On 3/29/06, Dennis Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not quite on the same topic, but perhaps it belong there. I think most of
use use both the stdlib and some selection of other libraries
(MySQL-Python, ReportLab Toolkit, PyChart, and PyXML, for example). These
libraries have to be managed
On Thursday 30 March 2006 08:39, Brett Cannon wrote:
Here is a place I think we can take a queue from Java. I think we
should have a root package, 'py', and then have subpackages within
that.
org.python.stdlib, surely? wink
I don't have a problem with reorganising the standard library, but
On 3/29/06, Anthony Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 30 March 2006 08:39, Brett Cannon wrote:
Here is a place I think we can take a queue from Java. I think we
should have a root package, 'py', and then have subpackages within
that.
org.python.stdlib, surely? wink
I don't
On Thursday 30 March 2006 10:31, Brett Cannon wrote:
I don't have a problem with reorganising the standard library,
but what's the motivation for moving everything under a new root?
Is it just to allow people to unambigiously get hold of something
from the stdlib, rather than following the
On 3/29/06, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/29/06, Anthony Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 30 March 2006 08:39, Brett Cannon wrote:
Here is a place I think we can take a queue from Java. I think we
should have a root package, 'py', and then have subpackages within
Anthony Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have a problem with reorganising the standard library, but
what's the motivation for moving everything under a new root? Is it
just to allow people to unambigiously get hold of something from the
stdlib, rather than following the normal search
Brett While this is going to require a PEP (which I am willing to
Brett write), the discussion of adding pysqlite has brought forth some
Brett discussion on naming and packaging in the stdlub. Perhaps it's
Brett time to start discussing the Great Library Reorganization that
12 matches
Mail list logo
