On 5/7/19 8:39 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Disclaimer: this topic seems to have been split over at least two issues
on the bug tracker, a Python-Ideas thread from 2018, Discourse (I
think...) and who knows what else. I haven't read it all, so excuse me
if I'm raising something already discussed.
Disclaimer: this topic seems to have been split over at least two issues
on the bug tracker, a Python-Ideas thread from 2018, Discourse (I
think...) and who knows what else. I haven't read it all, so excuse me
if I'm raising something already discussed.
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 08:39:41PM -0400,
Hi, Tim.
Your name came up frequently as a target for this use case. I think we’ve come
up with a pretty good solution.
Now if I could only convince my clients to upgrade from 2.7! I’ve heard about
these f-string things, and I think I would enjoy using them.
Eric
> On May 7, 2019, at 12:50
[Larry Hastings ]
> Guido just stopped by--we're all at the PyCon 2019 dev sprints--and we had
> a chat about it. Guido likes it but wanted us to restore a little of the
> magical
> behavior we had in "!d": now, = in f-strings will default to repr (!r), unless
> you specify a format spec. If you
On 5/7/19 9:49 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On May 7, 2019, at 03:52, Steve Holden wrote:
What's not to like?
My only complaint is that you steadfastly refuse use Guido’s time machine keys
to make this available in 3.7.
Open a feature request here: https://github.com/asottile/future-fstrings
> My only complaint is that you steadfastly refuse use Guido’s time machine
> keys to make this available in 3.7.
Wait a minute, Barry. You mean you don't already have an Emacs
function to do the rewriting as a pre-save-hook?
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailin
Guido just stopped by--we're all at the PyCon 2019 dev sprints--and we
had a chat about it. Guido likes it but wanted us to restore a little
of the magical behavior we had in "!d": now, = in f-strings will default
to repr (!r), /unless/ you specify a format spec. If you specify a
format spec
On May 7, 2019, at 03:52, Steve Holden wrote:
>
> What's not to like?
My only complaint is that you steadfastly refuse use Guido’s time machine keys
to make this available in 3.7.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
P
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 01:43, Eric V. Smith wrote:
> After that lightning talk, Larry and I talked about it some more, and
> for a number of reasons decided that it would make more sense if the
> syntax used an = sign. So we came up with f"{foo=}", which would also
> produce "foo='Hello'".
Works f
What's not to like?
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 2:31 AM Glenn Linderman
wrote:
> On 5/6/2019 5:39 PM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
>
> Last fall Larry Hastings made a suggestion for adding a way to make
> so-called "print-based debugging" easier with f-strings. Basically the
> approach is that f-strings wou
On 5/6/2019 5:39 PM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
Last fall Larry Hastings made a suggestion for adding a way to make
so-called "print-based debugging" easier with f-strings. Basically the
approach is that f-strings would be able to produce the text of the
expression and the value of that expression, w
Last fall Larry Hastings made a suggestion for adding a way to make
so-called "print-based debugging" easier with f-strings. Basically the
approach is that f-strings would be able to produce the text of the
expression and the value of that expression, without repeating the
expression in the f-s
12 matches
Mail list logo
