On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:58 PM, David Goodger wrote:
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Wes Turner wrote:
> > Where would be a good place for test cases for an rst_escape() function?
> > Docutils?
> >
> >
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Wes Turner wrote:
> Where would be a good place for test cases for an rst_escape() function?
> Docutils?
>
> https://github.com/westurner/dotfiles/blob/develop/scripts/git-changelog.py
I'd say that the test cases for any function should
Where would be a good place for test cases for an rst_escape() function?
Docutils?
https://github.com/westurner/dotfiles/blob/develop/scripts/git-changelog.py
- rst_escape # YMMV
- $ git-changelog.py -r "release/0.3.14" --hdr= "+"`
On Monday, May 1, 2017, Nick Coghlan
On 1 May 2017 at 17:13, Martin Panter wrote:
> On 1 May 2017 at 06:37, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm trying to write a NEWS entry that explains that the
>> ":func:`bytes`" cross-references have changed to refer to the type
>> descriptions by
On 1 May 2017 at 06:37, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm trying to write a NEWS entry that explains that the
> ":func:`bytes`" cross-references have changed to refer to the type
> descriptions by default (matching other builtin container types), so
> you now need to use
Hi folks,
I'm trying to write a NEWS entry that explains that the
":func:`bytes`" cross-references have changed to refer to the type
descriptions by default (matching other builtin container types), so
you now need to use ``:ref:`func-bytes`" to refer to the old target in
the list of builtin