On 2013-03-11 5:44 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
though some patience
and persistence may be required.
I have a wife and kids. This, I've become quite good at ;)
Take a look at http://bugs.python.org/issue2193 (for example), and see
if you still want to tackle this topic :) (I hope you do).
E
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 22:46:26 -0700, Demian Brecht
wrote:
> On 2013-03-10 1:59 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> I was hoping that there would be a little more interest (and potentially
> some further historical context on why the module was implemented as it
> was) from those in the group.
It isn't
On 2013-03-10 2:36 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
A) For similar reasons, I consider the proposal a first draft, and
probably not the exact right thing to do.
That is correct. The more I think about it, the more I'm convincing
myself that even though the proposal is more sane than what's there
right
On 2013-03-10 1:59 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
To be clear, just passing the stdlib tests is*not* sufficient to think
that backward compatibility is not likely to be broken. Deciding about
the likelihood of breakage is a hard problem, to which we generally
employ gut-level heuristics:) (And cod
On 3/10/2013 4:59 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
To be clear, just passing the stdlib tests is *not* sufficient to think
that backward compatibility is not likely to be broken. Deciding about
the likelihood of breakage is a hard problem, to which we generally
employ gut-level heuristics :) (And cod
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 12:13:54 +1100, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On 02/03/13 02:43, Demian Brecht wrote:
> > Cross-posting from python-ideas due to no response there. Perhaps it's
> > due to a general lack of usage/caring for cookiejar, but figured
> > /someone/'s got to have an opinion about my propo
On 02/03/13 02:43, Demian Brecht wrote:
Cross-posting from python-ideas due to no response there. Perhaps it's
due to a general lack of usage/caring for cookiejar, but figured
/someone/'s got to have an opinion about my proposal ;)
Apparently not :-(
TL;DR: CookieJar > FileCookieJar > *Cooki
Cross-posting from python-ideas due to no response there. Perhaps it's
due to a general lack of usage/caring for cookiejar, but figured
/someone/'s got to have an opinion about my proposal ;)
Note that I've moved my discussion from bug 16942 to 16901
(http://bugs.python.org/issue16901) as they're
