On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
On 21/12/2011 15:26, anatoly techtonik wrote:
I believe most AppEngine applications in Python are still using 2.5
run-time. So are development boxes for these applications. It may take
another year or two
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 07:42 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Dec 21, 2011, at 07:16 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays?
FWIW, Ubuntu dropped 2.5 quite a while ago.
Some servers I deploy to run Ubuntu, but we're installing previous
python
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:42:45AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
FWIW, Ubuntu dropped 2.5 quite a while ago. The next LTS (long term support)
That's true for *CURRENT* releases, however Ubuntu still supports Python
2.5 via 8.04 LTS (end of life in April 2013). Lucid is 2.6 and goes EOL in
2015.
What's the python-dev view on this?
Original Message
Subject: Anyone still using Python 2.5?
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:15:46 +
From: Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk
To: Python List python-l...@python.org,
testing-in-pyt...@lists.idyll.org
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:16, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays?
Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
This seems rather off-topic for python-dev.
FWIW, on Gentoo
Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
RHEL 5.7 ships with Python 2.4.3. So no, not everybody is on 2.6+
today, and this won't happen before a couple years.
cf
___
Python-Dev mailing list
On Dec 21, 2011, at 07:16 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays?
FWIW, Ubuntu dropped 2.5 quite a while ago. The next LTS (long term support)
release in April 2012 will have only Python 2.7 (and 3.2). The currently
in-development next Debian
I believe most AppEngine applications in Python are still using 2.5
run-time. So are development boxes for these applications. It may take
another year or two for the transition.
--
anatoly t.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.ukwrote:
What's the python-dev
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 10:42 +0100, Charles-François Natali wrote:
Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
RHEL 5.7 ships with Python 2.4.3. So no, not everybody is on 2.6+
today, and this won't happen before a couple years.
(and RHEL
FWIW, the most recent version of pywin32 has the following download
counts (rounded to the nearest thousand)
Version 32bit 64bit
-
3.2 - 75,000 9,000
3.1 - 4,000 1,000
2.7 - 126,000 16,000
2.6 - 46,000 6,000
2.5 - 21,000 n/a
2.4
What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays?
There is no such consensus :-)
Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
At work, we are still using Python 2.5. Six months ago, we started a
project to upgrade to 2.7, but we
On 21/12/2011 15:26, anatoly techtonik wrote:
I believe most AppEngine applications in Python are still using 2.5
run-time. So are development boxes for these applications. It may take
another year or two for the transition.
App engine 1.6 improved support of Python 2.7, so I hope that
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 02:49:06AM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote:
Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
At work, we are still using Python 2.5. Six months ago, we started a
project to upgrade to 2.7, but we have now more urgent tasks, so
13 matches
Mail list logo
