Thoughts on os.path? What happened to the idea of a new path object?
--Guido
-- Forwarded message --
From: Talin viri...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: I was just thinking that os.path could use some love...
To: Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
On
Thoughts on os.path? What happened to the idea of a new path object?
I don't know if it's related, but there are two new interesting
projects: pathlib and walkdir.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pathlib
https://pathlib.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/walkdir
http://bugs.python.org/issue11344 evolved into a patch for 'splitpath',
similar to splitall. Antoine's pathlib (PEP 428) is also mentioned
at the end, which is probably what Guido is thinking of.
--David
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:26:08 -0800, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
Thoughts on
Thoughts on os.path? What happened to the idea of a new path object?
You old pot stirrer! wink
I wonder about this from time-to-time as well, so was just interested
enough to wander over to PyPI and see what I could dig up. There are
a couple path module/package implementations on PyPI.
On 30Jan2013 13:26, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
| Thoughts on os.path? What happened to the idea of a new path object? [...]
| From: Talin viri...@gmail.com [...]
| On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
| Hmm... Mind if I just forward to
