Brett Cannon wrote:
OK, since no one has really said anything, I am going to assume no one
has issues with importlib in terms of me checking it in or choosing a
name for it (I like importlib more than imp so I will probably stick
with that).
So I will do some file renaming and reorganization, ge
OK, since no one has really said anything, I am going to assume no one
has issues with importlib in terms of me checking it in or choosing a
name for it (I like importlib more than imp so I will probably stick
with that).
So I will do some file renaming and reorganization, get the code set
up to b
2009/1/8 Nick Coghlan :
>> Well, it's not part of the interpreter yet. That can be viewed as a
>> separate step.
>
> True, but what you're doing here can be viewed as the continuation of
> the original implementation plan for PEP 302 - it was always intended
> that every module would eventually get
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 13:21, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Brett Cannon wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:35, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>> Brett Cannon wrote:
One, does anyone have issues if I check in importlib? We have
typically said code has to have been selected as best-of-breed by the
c
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 13:14, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Brett Cannon python.org> writes:
>>
>> One, does anyone have issues if I check in importlib? We have
>> typically said code has to have been selected as best-of-breed by the
>> community first, so I realize I am asking for a waiver on this one
Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:35, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> Brett Cannon wrote:
>>> One, does anyone have issues if I check in importlib? We have
>>> typically said code has to have been selected as best-of-breed by the
>>> community first, so I realize I am asking for a waiver on t
Brett Cannon python.org> writes:
>
> One, does anyone have issues if I check in importlib? We have
> typically said code has to have been selected as best-of-breed by the
> community first, so I realize I am asking for a waiver on this one.
Have you tried to assess its interaction with setuptool
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> 2009/1/8 Brett Cannon :
>> Thanks, Paul! I changed it to _os.getcwd() since that's what nt exposes.
>
> Ta. I wasn't sure _os.getcwd() returned a full pathname.
>
> The only difference between the importlib results and the normal ones
> seems to
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:57, Paul Moore wrote:
> 2009/1/8 Brett Cannon :
>> Thanks, Paul! I changed it to _os.getcwd() since that's what nt exposes.
>
> Ta. I wasn't sure _os.getcwd() returned a full pathname.
>
> The only difference between the importlib results and the normal ones
> seems to be
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:35, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Brett Cannon wrote:
>> One, does anyone have issues if I check in importlib? We have
>> typically said code has to have been selected as best-of-breed by the
>> community first, so I realize I am asking for a waiver on this one.
>
> That rule has
2009/1/8 Brett Cannon :
> Thanks, Paul! I changed it to _os.getcwd() since that's what nt exposes.
Ta. I wasn't sure _os.getcwd() returned a full pathname.
The only difference between the importlib results and the normal ones
seems to be that with importlib, test_multiprocessing is skipped,
where
Brett Cannon wrote:
> One, does anyone have issues if I check in importlib? We have
> typically said code has to have been selected as best-of-breed by the
> community first, so I realize I am asking for a waiver on this one.
That rule has never really applied to things that are part of the
interp
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:26, Paul Moore wrote:
> 2009/1/8 Brett Cannon :
>> My work rewriting import in pure Python code has reached beta.
>> Basically the code is semantically complete and as
>> backwards-compatible as I can make it short of widespread testing or
>> running on a Windows box.
>
>
2009/1/8 Brett Cannon :
> My work rewriting import in pure Python code has reached beta.
> Basically the code is semantically complete and as
> backwards-compatible as I can make it short of widespread testing or
> running on a Windows box.
I should have done this earlier, sorry. A quick test on W
My work rewriting import in pure Python code has reached beta.
Basically the code is semantically complete and as
backwards-compatible as I can make it short of widespread testing or
running on a Windows box. There are still some tweaks here and there I
want to make and an API to expose, but __impo
15 matches
Mail list logo
