On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:53:10PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Is pydotorg-www still the place for website questions?* If so, I should
> probably take this over there...
Just 'pydotorg' is the current list
(http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg).
Looking at the access logs, mail.pytho
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:37:09AM +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> have the following HTML tag in them:
>
> which explicitly instructs Web spiders *not* to index contents nor follow
> links.
I believe this makes spiders not index this page, but does follow
links. Individual messages have "in
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Georg Brandl gmx.net> writes:
>> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>>> I think the better syntax would be to add site:mail.python.org to the
>>> query, but you're right, that doesn't seem to find recent messages.
>>> Maybe the absence of a robots.txt file on mail.python.org could b
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> I think the better syntax would be to add site:mail.python.org to the
> query, but you're right, that doesn't seem to find recent messages.
> Maybe the absence of a robots.txt file on mail.python.org could be a
> partial explanation?
Doesn't the absence of a robots.txt
I think the better syntax would be to add site:mail.python.org to the
query, but you're right, that doesn't seem to find recent messages.
Maybe the absence of a robots.txt file on mail.python.org could be a
partial explanation?
(Disclaimer: I may work for Google, and Google's first crawler may
hav
Is anyone else having trouble getting the python.org mail archive to
turn up in Google searches for python-dev messages?
I prefer to use that archive rather than one of the multitude of 3rd
party archives when linking posts from PEPs and tracker issues, but for
the last few weeks I've had to go fi
