On 6/8/2012 6:41 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Dan Stromberg wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> Dan Stromberg wrote:
>>> Did the import semantics change in cpython 3.3a4?
>>>
>>> I used to be able to import treap.py even though I had a treap
>>> directory in my cwd. With
Dan Stromberg wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Dan Stromberg wrote:
Did the import semantics change in cpython 3.3a4?
I used to be able to import treap.py even though I had a treap
directory in my cwd. With 3.3a4, I have to rename the treap
directory to see treap.py.
Frank Wierzbicki wrote:
> On 7/5/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Hi Frank,
>>
>>Have you and/or the Jython community made up your mind about this? The
>>thread seems to have disappeared after you posted (or perhaps it
>>continued only on jython-dev, which I don't read?).
>
> T
On 7/5/06, Frank Wierzbicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Frank> That said, I still regard Samuele Pedroni as the ultimate
> > Frank> authority on Jython and give him pretty much full veto power. He
> > Frank> fortunately c
Skip> Does that make Samele the DBPV (Dictator benevolo per vita)? ;-)
Alex> In Italian that would be DBAV (Dittatore benevolo a vita)...;-)
Damn Google Translator. File a bug report for me please Alex (or Guido or
Jeremy or Neal or ...). ;-)
Skip
__
On 7/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Frank> That said, I still regard Samuele Pedroni as the ultimate
> Frank> authority on Jython and give him pretty much full veto power. He
> Frank> fortunately continues to watch the checkins and prods me when I
> Frank> g
In Italian that would be DBAV (Dittatore benevolo a vita)...;-)
Alex
On 7/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Frank> That said, I still regard Samuele Pedroni as the ultimate
> Frank> authority on Jython and give him pretty much full veto power. He
> Frank> fortu
Frank> That said, I still regard Samuele Pedroni as the ultimate
Frank> authority on Jython and give him pretty much full veto power. He
Frank> fortunately continues to watch the checkins and prods me when I
Frank> go in the wrong direction.
Does that make Samele the DBPV (Dictat
On 7/5/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Have you and/or the Jython community made up your mind about this? The
> thread seems to have disappeared after you posted (or perhaps it
> continued only on jython-dev, which I don't read?).
The thread pretty much stopped there
> In that case, why not post a news item saying this? The website is
> probably the first place people look...
>
I think any news other than "here is the beta -- follow this link to
download it" would be kind of a waste at this point. And that will
come when I finish __slots__, subclassable "type"
On 7/5/06, Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 July 2006 18:12, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > I'm asked
> > occasionally what the status of Jython is; people point out that
> > the last release was 2.1 many years ago and the website has no news
> > since early 2005; thy're afr
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 18:12, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I'm asked
> occasionally what the status of Jython is; people point out that
> the last release was 2.1 many years ago and the website has no news
> since early 2005; thy're afraid that Jython is dying and that it's
> not a viable choice fo
On 6/25/06, Frank Wierzbicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the untrimmed conversation, but I've cc'ed jython-dev, my
> comments are at the bottom.
>
> On 6/12/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/12/06, Samuele Pedroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Fabio Zadrozny wro
Sorry for the untrimmed conversation, but I've cc'ed jython-dev, my
comments are at the bottom.
On 6/12/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/12/06, Samuele Pedroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Fabio Zadrozny wrote:
> > > Python and Jython import semantics differ on how sub-pack
> this is mildy insulting, to the people that spent time trying to find
> the best compromises between various issues and keep jython alive.
Sorry, didn't mean to disparage that work.
Bill
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.p
writes:
> what [Python] specification?
Good meta-point.
Bill
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Bill Janssen wrote:
> If it's Python, it has to comply with the Python specification,
> regardless of what Java does.
what specification ?
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscri
Bill Janssen wrote:
>>the difference in Jython is deliberate. I think the reason was to mimic
>>more the Java style for this, in java fully qualified names always work.
>>In jython importing the top level packages is enough to get a similar
>>effect.
>>
>>This is unlikely to change for backward
> the difference in Jython is deliberate. I think the reason was to mimic
> more the Java style for this, in java fully qualified names always work.
> In jython importing the top level packages is enough to get a similar
> effect.
>
> This is unlikely to change for backward compatibility reason
On 6/12/06, Samuele Pedroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabio Zadrozny wrote:
> > Python and Jython import semantics differ on how sub-packages should be
> > accessed after importing some module:
> >
> > Jython 2.1 on java1.5.0 (JIT: null)
> > Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more info
Fabio Zadrozny wrote:
> Python and Jython import semantics differ on how sub-packages should be
> accessed after importing some module:
>
> Jython 2.1 on java1.5.0 (JIT: null)
> Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
> >>> import xml
> >>> xml.dom
>
>
> Python 2.4.2 (#
"Fabio Zadrozny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>Jython 2.1 on java1.5.0 (JIT: null)
>Python 2.4.2 (#67, Sep 28 2005, 12:41:11) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on
>win32
Jython 2.1 intends to match Python 2.1, I believe.
Python 2.2, which I still have loaded, matches Python 2.4 in the behavior
Python and Jython import semantics differ on how sub-packages should be accessed after importing some module:Jython 2.1 on java1.5.0 (JIT: null)Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import xml>>> xml.domPython 2.4.2 (#67, Sep 28 2005, 12:41:11) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel
23 matches
Mail list logo
