On Jan 24, 2008 12:40 PM, Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The spreadsheet notes a possible __future__ statement requirement for
> oct(). The PEP doesn't mention this, and I'm not sure I understand the
> issue. Any clues?
You can't change the default oct() to return '0o123'; but perhaps y
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2008 7:40 AM, Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In 3.0, the code to implement long.__format__() calls PyNumber_ToBase to
>> do the heavy lifting. If someone is planning on implementing
>> PyNumber_ToBase in 2.6, I'll wait for them to do so. If not, I gu
On Jan 23, 2008 7:40 AM, Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In 3.0, the code to implement long.__format__() calls PyNumber_ToBase to
> do the heavy lifting. If someone is planning on implementing
> PyNumber_ToBase in 2.6, I'll wait for them to do so. If not, I guess
> I'll either do it mysel
In 3.0, the code to implement long.__format__() calls PyNumber_ToBase to
do the heavy lifting. If someone is planning on implementing
PyNumber_ToBase in 2.6, I'll wait for them to do so. If not, I guess
I'll either do it myself, or hack around it.
Is this on anyone's To Do list? I don't see
