Just a quick note based on some of the discussion on the Doc-SIG list:
Some people are getting asked to convert their documentation contributions to
LaTeX themselves, and that *is* a barrier to contribution. I've generally
stated that I'm willing to perform conversion, making plain text / ReST
Fred Some people are getting asked to convert their documentation
Fred contributions to LaTeX themselves...
Who is asking this of potential contributors? I know you, Aahz and I have
repeatedly told people on c.l.py that LaTeX knowledge is not necessary.
Plain text is okay. What do we
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:23:03PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who is asking this of potential contributors? I know you, Aahz and I have
repeatedly told people on c.l.py that LaTeX knowledge is not necessary.
One comment on a bug to this effect was found. I don't think there's
a point in
On Thursday 22 December 2005 13:39, Facundo Batista wrote:
Very interesting. What I don't know here is how to submit patches...
Patches certainly isn't the right word for changes not described as source
diffs. I cleaned up some text about that on python.org earlier.
I mean, if they were in
On Thursday 22 December 2005 13:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who is asking this of potential contributors? I know you, Aahz and I have
repeatedly told people on c.l.py that LaTeX knowledge is not necessary.
Plain text is okay. What do we need to do to squash this meme?
As Andrew noted, it
Fred == Fred L Drake, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fred On Thursday 22 December 2005 13:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who is asking this of potential contributors? I know you, Aahz
and I have repeatedly told people on c.l.py that LaTeX
knowledge is not necessary. Plain text is
