Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 22:43, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > > What redirect.txt did you edit specifically? > > > > > > It was beta.python.org/build/redirects.txt > > , but I went ahead and > > reverted the change since your solution works. > > Ah. Tha

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

> What redirect.txt did you edit specifically? > > > It was beta.python.org/build/redirects.txt > , but I went ahead and > reverted the change since your solution works. Ah. That file isn't used, AFAICT, so I now deleted it. If there are any other

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 15:40, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > > As for redirects: it's certainly possible to redirect ^/dev$ to > > /devguide, leaving /dev..* alone. I can set this up if you want me > to. > > > > > > Please. Or double-check what I put into pydotorg's redirect.txt will > > wor

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

> As for redirects: it's certainly possible to redirect ^/dev$ to > /devguide, leaving /dev..* alone. I can set this up if you want me to. > > > Please. Or double-check what I put into pydotorg's redirect.txt will > work properly. What redirect.txt did you edit specifically? I have now

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:00 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:38, James Y Knight wrote: > > On Feb 23, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:52, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> Am 23.02.2011 19:30, schrieb Brett Cannon: >> > I won't add the li

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:51, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > > But python.org/dev/ is a dead page. I was > > trying to avoid adding a redirect for python.org/dev/ > > as I was afraid that it would lead to the > > website doing something silly like re

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:38, James Y Knight wrote: > > On Feb 23, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:52, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > >> Am 23.02.2011 19:30, schrieb Brett Cannon: >> > I won't add the link back >> >> Why not? It's a useful link apparently. Th

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

> But python.org/dev/ is a dead page. I was > trying to avoid adding a redirect for python.org/dev/ > as I was afraid that it would lead to the > website doing something silly like redirecting everything below that > URL, but obviously this can cont

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

On Feb 23, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:52, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Am 23.02.2011 19:30, schrieb Brett Cannon: > > I won't add the link back > > Why not? It's a useful link apparently. The "Developer's Guide" > link does not hint that it will be th

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

I just added a Quick Links section to the devguide at the very top which is short and to the point. I also committed to pydotorg for python.org/dev/ to redirect to docs.python.org/devguide/, so this whole discussion is dealt with IMO. On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:06, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On W

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:52, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Am 23.02.2011 19:30, schrieb Brett Cannon: > > I won't add the link back > > Why not? It's a useful link apparently. The "Developer's Guide" > link does not hint that it will be the only way to find the > bug tracker. > But python.org/dev

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:53, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:21:58 -0800 > Brett Cannon wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:52, Antoine Pitrou > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:30:54 -0800 > > > Brett Cannon wrote: > > > > I won't add the link back, but I will try to

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:21:58 -0800 Brett Cannon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:52, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:30:54 -0800 > > Brett Cannon wrote: > > > I won't add the link back, but I will try to change the global link on > > the > > > website to point to the devgu

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

Am 23.02.2011 19:30, schrieb Brett Cannon: > I won't add the link back Why not? It's a useful link apparently. The "Developer's Guide" link does not hint that it will be the only way to find the bug tracker. It's like adding the download page at the end of the tutorial - "you can get Python only

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:52, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:30:54 -0800 > Brett Cannon wrote: > > I won't add the link back, but I will try to change the global link on > the > > website to point to the devguide. python.org/dev/ at this point exists > > purely to not break pre-

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:30:54 -0800 Brett Cannon wrote: > I won't add the link back, but I will try to change the global link on the > website to point to the devguide. python.org/dev/ at this point exists > purely to not break pre-existing links. There are items there that are out of scope for th

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

I won't add the link back, but I will try to change the global link on the website to point to the devguide. python.org/dev/ at this point exists purely to not break pre-existing links. On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 07:58, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Hello, > > I think it was a slight mistake to remove

Re: [Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

+1, I often use that link as well. 2011/2/23 Antoine Pitrou : > > Hello, > > I think it was a slight mistake to remove the link to the issue tracker > from the sidebar in the "core development" section. Dave Beazley just > complained about it > (http://twitter.com/dabeaz/status/40397577916661760)

[Python-Dev] Link to issue tracker

Hello, I think it was a slight mistake to remove the link to the issue tracker from the sidebar in the "core development" section. Dave Beazley just complained about it (http://twitter.com/dabeaz/status/40397577916661760) and I think it will probably confuse other people too. Could we add it back