On 12/14/05, Martin Blais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello again.
>
> As I'm digging deeper into LISP and Scheme these days, I was
> wondering, is there a good compelling reason why in Python we don't
> have a native singly-linked and doubly-linked list types?
>
> That is, reasons other than
> -
Martin Blais wrote:
> As I'm digging deeper into LISP and Scheme these days, I was
> wondering, is there a good compelling reason why in Python we don't
> have a native singly-linked and doubly-linked list types?
As you seem to be asking for the historical reason: because nobody
ever wanted it so
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005, Martin Blais wrote:
>
> As I'm digging deeper into LISP and Scheme these days, I was
> wondering, is there a good compelling reason why in Python we don't
> have a native singly-linked and doubly-linked list types?
How about taking this dicussion to comp.lang.python and prov
Hello again.
As I'm digging deeper into LISP and Scheme these days, I was
wondering, is there a good compelling reason why in Python we don't
have a native singly-linked and doubly-linked list types?
That is, reasons other than
- "you can get by without it" (sometimes I *want* lists), or
- "you c
