Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
> I can't understand what the problem with SocketHandler/DatagramHandler
> is. As they use pickle, they should surely be able to send records with
> Unicode strings in them, no?
Of course you are right. When I posted that it was a knee-jerk reaction to the
is
> I've noticed that the socket-based logging handlers - SocketHandler,
> DatagramHandler and SysLogHandler - aren't Unicode-aware and can break in the
> presence of Unicode messages.
I can't understand what the problem with SocketHandler/DatagramHandler
is. As they use pickle, they should surely b
Vinay Sajip wrote:
Thanks to
http://bugs.python.org/issue7077
I've noticed that the socket-based logging handlers - SocketHandler,
DatagramHandler and SysLogHandler - aren't Unicode-aware and can break in the
presence of Unicode messages. I'd like to fix this by giving these handlers an
option
>
Thanks to
http://bugs.python.org/issue7077
I've noticed that the socket-based logging handlers - SocketHandler,
DatagramHandler and SysLogHandler - aren't Unicode-aware and can break in the
presence of Unicode messages. I'd like to fix this by giving these handlers an
optional (encoding=None)
