Does anyone here have time to look at this?
On 6/26/06, Alexander Belopolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/19/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/14/06, Alexander Belopolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ... It would be better to change the message
> > > to "'Foo' objec
On 6/19/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/14/06, Alexander Belopolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... It would be better to change the message
> > to "'Foo' object has only read-only attributes (assign to .bar)" as in
> > the case tp_setattro == tp_setattr == NULL in PyObje
On 6/14/06, Alexander Belopolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When an extension type Foo defines tp_getattr, but leaves tp_setattr
> NULL, an attempt to set an attribute bar results in an AttributeError
> with the message "'Foo' object has no attribute 'bar'". This message
> is misleading because
When an extension type Foo defines tp_getattr, but leaves tp_setattr
NULL, an attempt to set an attribute bar results in an AttributeError
with the message "'Foo' object has no attribute 'bar'". This message
is misleading because the object may have the attribute 'bar' as
implemented in tp_getattr
