On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 09:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> That said, I don't think the size is very important. For any non-trivial
> Python application, the size of unicodedata will be negligible compared
> to the size of Python objects.
That depends very much on the platform and the application. F
Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 à 09:32 -0500, Alexander Belopolsky a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:46:33 -0500
> > Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
> >>
> >> In practical terms, UCD comes at a price. The unicodedata module size
> >> is over 700
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:46:33 -0500
> Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
>>
>> In practical terms, UCD comes at a price. The unicodedata module size
>> is over 700K on my machine. This is almost half the size of the
>> python executable and by fa
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:46:33 -0500
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
>
> In practical terms, UCD comes at a price. The unicodedata module size
> is over 700K on my machine. This is almost half the size of the
> python executable and by far the largest extension module. (only CJK
> encodings come clos
