On 7/2/05, Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like a better way to go is a Money package (or perhaps a Financial
> package) and just create the Currency module within it for now. Anyway,
Something to consider!
> given that this isn't going to be a real PEP any time soon, please
> restric
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005, Facundo Batista wrote:
> On 7/1/05, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> * Time value of money computations are typically dimensionless (not
>> sensitive to currency type or formatting) and they often have algorithm
>> specific rounding needs (round at the end o
On 7/1/05, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Facundo]
> > The pre-PEP is almost done, and the corresponding
> > test cases are all written.
>
> What is the part about the pre-PEP? Something like this probably
> shouldn't go in the standard library until it has been proven in the
>
[Facundo]
> The pre-PEP is almost done, and the corresponding
> test cases are all written.
What is the part about the pre-PEP? Something like this probably
shouldn't go in the standard library until it has been proven in the
field. This doubly true for a module that has made some unusual OO
des
People:
The Money two-days sprint in EuroPython 2005 has finished.
We advanced a lot. The pre-PEP is almost done, and the corresponding
test cases are all written.
We need to finish the structure procesing for currency general
information, and bring general functions to the module, but most of
t
