Re: [Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package

2011-08-11 Thread yoav glazner
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Antoine Pitrou > wrote: > > Le Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:03:35 +1000, > > Nick Coghlan a écrit : > >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Brian Curtin > >> wrote: > >> > Now that we have concurrent.futures, is ther

Re: [Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package

2011-08-11 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Le Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:03:35 +1000, > Nick Coghlan a écrit : >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Brian Curtin >> wrote: >> > Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for >> > multiprocessing to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions

Re: [Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package

2011-08-11 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Le Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:03:35 +1000, Nick Coghlan a écrit : > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Brian Curtin > wrote: > > Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for > > multiprocessing to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions a hope to add or move > > things in the future [0], which would

Re: [Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package

2011-08-10 Thread Jesse Noller
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Brian Curtin wrote: >> Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for multiprocessing >> to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions a hope to add or move things in the future >> [0], which would be now. > >

Re: [Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package

2011-08-10 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Brian Curtin wrote: > Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for multiprocessing > to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions a hope to add or move things in the future > [0], which would be now. As Jesse said, moving multiprocessing or threading wholesale

Re: [Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package

2011-08-10 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2011/8/10 Raymond Hettinger : > > On Aug 10, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >> Le Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:54:33 -0500, >> Benjamin Peterson a écrit : >>> 2011/8/10 Brian Curtin : Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for multiprocessing to follow suit? PEP 3148 me

Re: [Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package

2011-08-10 Thread Jesse Noller
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:36, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> >> Le Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:54:33 -0500, >> Benjamin Peterson a écrit : >> > 2011/8/10 Brian Curtin : >> > > Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for >> > > multiprocess

Re: [Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package

2011-08-10 Thread Raymond Hettinger
On Aug 10, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Le Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:54:33 -0500, > Benjamin Peterson a écrit : >> 2011/8/10 Brian Curtin : >>> Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for >>> multiprocessing to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions a hope to add or move >>> things

Re: [Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package

2011-08-10 Thread Brian Curtin
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:36, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Le Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:54:33 -0500, > Benjamin Peterson a écrit : > > 2011/8/10 Brian Curtin : > > > Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for > > > multiprocessing to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions a hope to add or move > >

Re: [Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package

2011-08-10 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Le Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:54:33 -0500, Benjamin Peterson a écrit : > 2011/8/10 Brian Curtin : > > Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for > > multiprocessing to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions a hope to add or move > > things in the future > > Is there some sort of concrete proposa

Re: [Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package

2011-08-10 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2011/8/10 Brian Curtin : > Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for multiprocessing > to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions a hope to add or move things in the future Is there some sort of concrete proposal? The PEP just seems to mention it as an idea. In general, -1. I think we don

[Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package

2011-08-10 Thread Brian Curtin
Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for multiprocessing to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions a hope to add or move things in the future [0], which would be now. [0] http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3148/#naming ___ Python-Dev mailing li