Bob Ippolito wrote:
> Doesn't this discussion belong on c.l.p / python-list?
yes, please.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/pyth
totally agree, removed them.
On 2/19/06, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know it is tempting and perhaps ok in your own privatecode, but casually
> masking builtins like 'str' in public library code sets a bad example ;-).
>
> tjr
>
>
>
> ___
I know it is tempting and perhaps ok in your own privatecode, but casually
masking builtins like 'str' in public library code sets a bad example ;-).
tjr
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
On Feb 19, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>>> @cmdloop.aliases('goodbye')
>>> @cmdloop.shorthelp('say goodbye')
>>> @cmdloop.usage('goodbye TARGET')
>>>
>>> to just:
>>>
>>> @cmdloop.addspec(aliases=['goodbye'], shorthelp ='say
>>> goodbye',
>>> usage
On 2/19/06, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> @cmdloop.aliases('goodbye')
> >> @cmdloop.shorthelp('say goodbye')
> >> @cmdloop.usage('goodbye TARGET')
> >>
> >> to just:
> >>
> >> @cmdloop.addspec(aliases=['goodbye'], shorthelp ='say goodbye',
> >> us
>> @cmdloop.aliases('goodbye')
>> @cmdloop.shorthelp('say goodbye')
>> @cmdloop.usage('goodbye TARGET')
>>
>> to just:
>>
>> @cmdloop.addspec(aliases=['goodbye'], shorthelp ='say goodbye',
>> usage='goodbye TARGET')
>>
>> leaving the possibility of multiple decorator
s/catch modules/catch exceptions/g
On 2/19/06, Crutcher Dunnavant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whoa, thanks. Incorporated the suggestions to the code.
>
> On 2/19/06, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [Crutcher Dunnavant]
> > > Anyway, I'm looking for feedback, feature requests befo
Whoa, thanks. Incorporated the suggestions to the code.
On 2/19/06, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Crutcher Dunnavant]
> > Anyway, I'm looking for feedback, feature requests before starting the
> > submission process.
>
> With respect to the API, the examples tend to be visually d
[Raymond Hettinger]
> 1) The "chars" variable can be eliminated and the "while chars" and
> "c=chars.pop(0)" sequence simplified to just:
>for c in reversed(str):
Actually, that should have been just:
for c in str:
. . .
Raymond
___
[Crutcher Dunnavant]
> Anyway, I'm looking for feedback, feature requests before starting the
> submission process.
With respect to the API, the examples tend to be visually dominated dominated
by
the series of decorators. The three decorators do nothing more than add a
function attribute, so
Yes, I know. Hence this not being a patch.
This is really meant to be a compelling alternative to cmd.Cmd, and as
such I'm trying to get some discussion about it.
On 2/19/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/19/06, Crutcher Dunnavant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is something I
On 2/19/06, Crutcher Dunnavant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is something I've been working on for a bit, and I think it is
> more or less ready to bring up on this list. I'd like to add a module
> (though probably not for 2.5).
>
> Before you ask, this module is _not_ compatible with cmd.py, a
oops, error in the example: s/commandLoop/CommandLoop/g
On 2/19/06, Crutcher Dunnavant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is something I've been working on for a bit, and I think it is
> more or less ready to bring up on this list. I'd like to add a module
> (though probably not for 2.5).
>
> Befor
This is something I've been working on for a bit, and I think it is
more or less ready to bring up on this list. I'd like to add a module
(though probably not for 2.5).
Before you ask, this module is _not_ compatible with cmd.py, as it is
command oriented, whereas cmd.py is line oriented.
Anyway,
14 matches
Mail list logo
