My colleague got an odd result today that is reproducible on his build
of Python (RedHat's distribution of Py2.4.2) but not any other builds
I've checked (including an Ubuntu Py2.4.2 built with a later version of
GCC). I hypothesized that this was a bug in the underlying GCC
libraries, but the
Raymond My colleague got an odd result today that is reproducible on
Raymond his build of Python (RedHat's distribution of Py2.4.2) but not
Raymond any other builds I've checked (including an Ubuntu Py2.4.2
Raymond built with a later version of GCC). I hypothesized that this
Raymond Hettinger schrieb:
My colleague got an odd result today that is reproducible on his build
of Python (RedHat's distribution of Py2.4.2) but not any other builds
I've checked (including an Ubuntu Py2.4.2 built with a later version of
GCC). I hypothesized that this was a bug in the
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
My colleague got an odd result today that is reproducible on his build
of Python (RedHat's distribution of Py2.4.2) but not any other builds
I've checked (including an Ubuntu Py2.4.2 built with a later version of
GCC). I hypothesized that this was a bug in the
[Raymond Hettinger]
My colleague got an odd result today that is reproducible on his build
of Python (RedHat's distribution of Py2.4.2) but not any other builds
I've checked (including an Ubuntu Py2.4.2 built with a later version of
GCC). I hypothesized that this was a bug in the underlying
* (1/100.0)
-19400.0
Raymond
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 1:44 PM
To: Raymond Hettinger
Cc: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Nondeterministic long-to-float coercion
Raymond My colleague got
2006/10/19, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My colleague got an odd result today that is reproducible on his build
of Python (RedHat's distribution of Py2.4.2) but not any other builds
...
set(-194 * (1/100.0) for i in range(1))
set([-19400.0, -193995904.0,
