A good plan. I think this could be added to 3.5 still? It's a pretty minor
adjustment to the PEP 492 machinery, really.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 Jun 2015 10:01, Ben Leslie be...@benno.id.au wrote:
If this seems like a good approach I'll
On 14/06/2015 11:50, Ben Leslie wrote:
Per Nick's advice I've created enhancement proposal 245340 with an
attached patch.
http://bugs.python.org/issue24450 as opposed to
http://bugs.python.org/issue24450#msg245340 :)
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
On 14 Jun 2015 19:17, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
A good plan. I think this could be added to 3.5 still? It's a pretty
minor adjustment to the PEP 492 machinery, really.
Good point - as per Ben's original post, the lack of it makes it quite hard
to get a clear picture of the system
Per Nick's advice I've created enhancement proposal 245340 with an
attached patch.
On 14 June 2015 at 19:16, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
A good plan. I think this could be added to 3.5 still? It's a pretty minor
adjustment to the PEP 492 machinery, really.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at
On 14 Jun 2015 03:35, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
From a learnability perspective, there's also nothing about an
f_stack attribute that says you can use this to find out where a
generator or coroutine has
On 14 Jun 2015 10:01, Ben Leslie be...@benno.id.au wrote:
If this seems like a good approach I'll try and work it in to a
suitable patch for contribution.
I think it's a good approach, and worth opening an enhancement issue for.
I expect any patch would need some adjustments after Yury has
Nick Coghlan wrote:
I wonder if in 3.6 it might be possible to *add* some bookkeeping to
await and yield from expressions that provides external visibility
into the underlying iterable or coroutine that the generator-iterator
or coroutine has delegated flow control to.
In my original
On 14 June 2015 at 09:20, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
I wonder if in 3.6 it might be possible to *add* some bookkeeping to
await and yield from expressions that provides external visibility
into the underlying iterable or coroutine that the
On 13 June 2015 at 19:03, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 June 2015 at 04:13, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
IOW I don't think that the problem here is that you haven't sufficiently
motivated
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 June 2015 at 04:13, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
IOW I don't think that the problem here is that you haven't sufficiently
motivated your use case -- you are asking for information that just isn't
On 13 June 2015 at 17:22, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 June 2015 at 04:13, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
IOW I don't think that the problem here is that you haven't sufficiently
motivated your use case -- you are asking for information that just isn't
available.
Hi ,
I had a Question,i hope i'll find the solution here.
Say i have a Queue.
h = Queue.Queue(maxsize=0)
h.put(1)
h.put(2)
h.empty()
False
h.join()
h.empty()
False
h.get()
1
h.get()
2
h.get()
Blocked...
My Question is :
In a single threaded environment why does
On 13 June 2015 at 04:13, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
IOW I don't think that the problem here is that you haven't sufficiently
motivated your use case -- you are asking for information that just isn't
available. (Which is actually where you started the thread -- you can get to
the
On 13 June 2015 at 20:25, Ben Leslie be...@benno.id.au wrote:
Is there any reason an f_stack attribute is not exposed for frames? Many of
the
other PyFrameObject values are exposed. I'm guessing that there probably
aren't too many places where you can get hold of a frame that doesn't have an
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 June 2015 at 20:25, Ben Leslie be...@benno.id.au wrote:
Is there any reason an f_stack attribute is not exposed for frames? Many
of the
other PyFrameObject values are exposed. I'm guessing that there probably
On 2015-06-13 11:38, jaivish kothari wrote:
Hi ,
I had a Question,i hope i'll find the solution here.
Say i have a Queue.
h = Queue.Queue(maxsize=0)
h.put(1)
h.put(2)
h.empty()
False
h.join()
h.empty()
False
h.get()
1
h.get()
2
h.get()
Blocked...
My
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Ben Leslie be...@benno.id.au wrote:
On 2 June 2015 at 14:39, Yury Selivanov yselivanov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ben,
On 2015-05-31 8:35 AM, Ben Leslie wrote:
Hi Yury,
I'm just starting my exploration into using async/await; all my
'real-world'
On 2 June 2015 at 14:39, Yury Selivanov yselivanov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ben,
On 2015-05-31 8:35 AM, Ben Leslie wrote:
Hi Yury,
I'm just starting my exploration into using async/await; all my
'real-world' scenarios are currently hypothetical.
One such hypothetical scenario however is
Hi Ben,
On 2015-05-31 8:35 AM, Ben Leslie wrote:
Hi Yury,
I'm just starting my exploration into using async/await; all my
'real-world' scenarios are currently hypothetical.
One such hypothetical scenario however is that if I have a server
process running, with some set of concurrent
Hi Yury,
I'm just starting my exploration into using async/await; all my
'real-world' scenarios are currently hypothetical.
One such hypothetical scenario however is that if I have a server
process running, with some set of concurrent connections, each managed
by a co-routine. Each co-routine is
Hi Ben,
Is there any real-world scenario where you would need this?
It looks like this can help with debugging, somehow, but the easiest
solution is to put a if debug: log(...) before yield in your
switch() function. You'll have a perfect traceback there.
Thanks,
Yury
On 2015-05-29 12:46 AM,
Hi all,
Apologies in advance; I'm not a regular, and this may have been
handled already (but I couldn't find it when searching).
I've been using the new async/await functionality (congrats again to
Yury on getting that through!), and I'd like to get a stack trace
between the place at which
22 matches
Mail list logo
