On 17 November 2014 19:23, Ned Deily wrote:
> Paul Moore wrote:
>> I don't know if this got lost in the other messages in this thread,
>> but *is* there a stable URL for "the latest Python 3.4 MSI for Windows
>> amd64" (or similar)?
>
> AFAIK, no, there is no such stable URL that directly downloa
In article
,
Paul Moore wrote:
> I don't know if this got lost in the other messages in this thread,
> but *is* there a stable URL for "the latest Python 3.4 MSI for Windows
> amd64" (or similar)?
AFAIK, no, there is no such stable URL that directly downloads the
latest installer(s) for a plat
On 15 November 2014 15:40, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 15 November 2014 15:17, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014, at 05:54, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On 15 Nov 2014 10:10, "Paul Moore" wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Incidentally, it would be really useful if python.org provided stable
>>> > > u
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 22:53:09 +0100
Victor Stinner wrote:
> > Also, distutils-sig does seem more appropriate,
>
> IMO we need a new mailing to discuss which mailing list is the most
> appropriate (which includes another new mailing list).
I suggest you first write a PEP, and find a BDFL-delegate.
> Also, distutils-sig does seem more appropriate,
IMO we need a new mailing to discuss which mailing list is the most
appropriate (which includes another new mailing list).
Victor
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org
>> The website has an API you know.
>
> Um, no. Where can I find out about it?
Ooh, I didn't expect that. I couldn't find any documentation, but the
source code of urls_api.py at
https://github.com/python/pythondotorg/tree/master/pydotorg is
certainly interesting.
Also, distutils-sig does seem m
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 15 November 2014 15:17, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014, at 05:54, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On 15 Nov 2014 10:10, "Paul Moore" wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Incidentally, it would be really useful if python.org provided stable
>>>
On 15 November 2014 15:17, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014, at 05:54, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On 15 Nov 2014 10:10, "Paul Moore" wrote:
>> >
>> > > Incidentally, it would be really useful if python.org provided stable
>> > > url's that always redirected to the latest .msi instal
On 15 November 2014 20:10, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 15 November 2014 00:12, Vincent Povirk wrote:
> > My end goal is to be able to package a Python application such that an
> > end-user on Windows (who doesn't know anything about Python) can
> > easily install it, without either of us having to th
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014, at 05:54, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On 15 Nov 2014 10:10, "Paul Moore" wrote:
> >
> > > Incidentally, it would be really useful if python.org provided stable
> > > url's that always redirected to the latest .msi installers, for
> > > bootstrapping purposes. I'd prefer to not
On 15 November 2014 10:54, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On 15 Nov 2014 10:10, "Paul Moore" wrote:
>>
>> > Incidentally, it would be really useful if python.org provided stable
>> > url's that always redirected to the latest .msi installers, for
>> > bootstrapping purposes. I'd prefer to not rely on c
On 15 Nov 2014 10:10, "Paul Moore" wrote:
>
> > Incidentally, it would be really useful if python.org provided stable
> > url's that always redirected to the latest .msi installers, for
> > bootstrapping purposes. I'd prefer to not rely on chocolatey (or on
> > scraping the web site) for this.
>
>
On 15 November 2014 00:12, Vincent Povirk wrote:
> My end goal is to be able to package a Python application such that an
> end-user on Windows (who doesn't know anything about Python) can
> easily install it, without either of us having to think about how all
> the dependencies are going to get t
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:12:59 -0600
Vincent Povirk wrote:
> I have been following OneGet development very closely, and I have
> volunteered to create a OneGet provider for installing Python
> packages. Normally, I would keep quiet about this sort of thing until
> I have actual code that works, but
On 11/14/2014 7:12 PM, Vincent Povirk wrote:
If anyone has questions about OneGet generally, you should probably
ask them directly (see https://github.com/OneGet/oneget), as I am not
a definitive source of information on the project.
No subscription needed to follow a thread. Python-dev is mi
Someone pointed out off-list that I didn't provide any explanation of
what OneGet is. I saw it had been brought up on this list earlier, and
incorrectly assumed that meant everyone would know what I was talking
about.
OneGet is a new unified interface for using tools that work with
software, which
I have been following OneGet development very closely, and I have
volunteered to create a OneGet provider for installing Python
packages. Normally, I would keep quiet about this sort of thing until
I have actual code that works, but since no one else on the OneGet
seems as interested in doing it, a
17 matches
Mail list logo
