On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 22:59, Tim Peters wrote:
Yup, me too -- between the two of us, we don't have enough fingers to
count how many trunks, branches, and tags of ZODB and Zope I have to
fiddle with.
I have a small inkling of your pain.
They're all still copy, paste, tail-edit for me, and--
Barry Warsaw wrote:
I know that SF has promised svn access to projects for a long time now,
but I haven't heard anything from them in a long time. It's listed
under their Strategic Projects but the last update to that news item
was back in April. Question: do we wait for SF to make the
On Thursday 28 July 2005 20:07, Fernando Perez wrote:
or something similar. It's an extra few chars, and it would give a
convenient way to branch off pieces of the main code into their own
subprojects in the future if needed.
More interestingly, keeping it in a single repository makes it
Tony Meyer wrote:
Is there any reason that this should be an option, and not just done?
Certainly: it's administrator load, which in turn is volunteer time.
For
occasional source (particularly C source) lookups, I've found webcvs really
useful (especially when on a machine without cvs or
On 7/29/05, Fred L. Drake, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 28 July 2005 20:07, Fernando Perez wrote:
or something similar. It's an extra few chars, and it would give a
convenient way to branch off pieces of the main code into their own
subprojects in the future if needed.
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
More interestingly, keeping it in a single repository makes it easier to
merge
projects, or parts of projects, together, without losing the history. This
would be useful when developing packages that may be considered for the
standard library, but which also
Barry Warsaw wrote:
We won't use plain text, but we may (or, we currently do) use basic auth
over ssl. The security then is in the passwords, so we have to make
sure they're generated securely.
That (sort of) *is* plain text passwords. Somebody who took over
svn.python.org can get the
Tim Peters wrote:
Ah, before I forget, single repository has worked very well for Zope
(which includes top-level Zope2, Zope3, ZODB, ZConfig, zdaemon, ...
projects):
http://svn.zope.org/
Long URLs don't really get in the way in practice (rarely a need to
type one after initial
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
