Hi,
Le mar. 2 avr. 2019 à 17:20, Calvin Spealman a écrit :
> While the PEP does show the version number as part of the path to the actual
> packages, implying support for multiple versions, this doesn't seem to be
> spelled out in the actual text. Presumably __pypackages__/3.8/ might sit
> bes
On 02.04.19 18:10, Steve Dower wrote:
> On 02Apr2019 0817, Calvin Spealman wrote:
>> (I originally posted this to python-ideas, where I was told none of this
>> PEP's
>> authors subscribe so probably no one will see it there, so I'm posting it
>> here
>> to raise the issue where it can get seen a
Sorry somehow missed Steve Dower's post:
that
discussion is mostly happening at
https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-582-python-local-packages-directory/963/
I"ll go there to comment.
-CHB
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 9:02 AM Chris Barker - NOAA Federal <
chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote:
>
> > I'd like t
> I'd like to raise a potential edge case that might be a problem, and likely
> an increasingly common one: users with multiple installations of the *same*
> version of Python.
I would suggest that that use case is best addressed by a system that
isolates the entire python environment, such as c
On 02Apr2019 0817, Calvin Spealman wrote:
(I originally posted this to python-ideas, where I was told none of this
PEP's authors subscribe so probably no one will see it there, so I'm
posting it here to raise the issue where it can get seen and hopefully
discussed)
Correct, thanks for posting
(I originally posted this to python-ideas, where I was told none of this
PEP's authors subscribe so probably no one will see it there, so I'm
posting it here to raise the issue where it can get seen and hopefully
discussed)
While the PEP does show the version number as part of the path to the
act
