On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Peter Moody peter at hda3.com writes:
I've never said otherwise. In fact, from an email last night, If what
the community requires is the library you've described, then ipaddr is
not that library. The changes *you*
[cc += david moss]
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Peter Moody peter at hda3.com writes:
I've never said otherwise. In fact, from an email last night, If what
the community
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org writes:
At the same time I don't think a complete reset of the proposed API is
necessary. I am rather more thinking of judicious API tweaks in order
to cover some new use cases, without requiring a complete rewrite or
destroying the usability of the
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:39:06 am Guido van Rossum wrote:
I think Peter is pretty frustrated by the many attacks on his
library. There are probably a number of different things going on
simultaneous: Peter has been driven into the defense by attacks both
reasonable and unreasonable, there have
2009/9/28 Peter Moody pe...@hda3.com
[cc += david moss]
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
Peter Moody peter at hda3.com writes:
I've never said otherwise. In fact, from
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org writes:
At the same time I don't think a complete reset of the proposed API is
necessary. I am rather more thinking of judicious API tweaks in order
to cover some new use cases,
I've never said otherwise. In fact, from an email last night, If what
the community requires is the library you've described, then ipaddr is
not that library. The changes *you* require make ipaddr significantly
less useful to me. I'm not prepared to make those changes in an
attempt seek acceptance
Peter Moody peter at hda3.com writes:
this is less useful (strictly removing functionality) and is an
example of what I explicitly said I was not going to do with ipaddr.
(please note the conditional wording here) Assuming that a significant number of
people agree that there is a design
Peter Moody peter at hda3.com writes:
I've never said otherwise. In fact, from an email last night, If what
the community requires is the library you've described, then ipaddr is
not that library. The changes *you* require make ipaddr significantly
less useful to me. I'm not prepared to make
