In article
,
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 22 October 2013 19:33, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> > Am 20.10.13 14:27, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
> >> I have posted the latest version of PEP 453 to python.org.
> >
> > This version looks good to me, and I accept it for inclusion in Python 3.4.
> >
> > I'd like
On Oct 22, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Am 20.10.13 14:27, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
>> I have posted the latest version of PEP 453 to python.org.
>
> This version looks good to me, and I accept it for inclusion in Python 3.4.
>
> I'd like to thank Nick for carefully editing this PE
On 22 October 2013 19:33, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 20.10.13 14:27, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
>> I have posted the latest version of PEP 453 to python.org.
>
> This version looks good to me, and I accept it for inclusion in Python 3.4.
>
> I'd like to thank Nick for carefully editing this PEP, and
Am 20.10.13 14:27, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
> I have posted the latest version of PEP 453 to python.org.
This version looks good to me, and I accept it for inclusion in Python 3.4.
I'd like to thank Nick for carefully editing this PEP, and I'd like to
cite it as an archetype for a well-written PEP.
I have posted the latest version of PEP 453 to python.org. It is
available in the usual place:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0453/
Three significant changes have been made since the last posted version:
* removed the proposal to change the script installation directory on
Windows, due t
