Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 554 v4 (new interpreters module)

On Dec 6, 2017 21:14, "Guido van Rossum" wrote: OK, then please just change the PEP's Version: header to 3.8. Will do. Have a nice vacation! :) -eric ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 554 v4 (new interpreters module)

OK, then please just change the PEP's Version: header to 3.8. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Eric Snow wrote: > > > On Dec 6, 2017 20:31, "Guido van Rossum" wrote: > > If the point is just to be able to test the existing API better, no PEP is >

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 554 v4 (new interpreters module)

On Dec 6, 2017 20:31, "Guido van Rossum" wrote: If the point is just to be able to test the existing API better, no PEP is needed, right? It would be an unsupported, undocumented API. In the short term that's one major goal. In the long term the functionality provided by the

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 554 v4 (new interpreters module)

If the point is just to be able to test the existing API better, no PEP is needed, right? It would be an unsupported, undocumented API. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 7 December 2017 at 12:46, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > So you're

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 554 v4 (new interpreters module)

On 7 December 2017 at 12:46, Guido van Rossum wrote: > So you're okay with putting this off till (at least) 3.8? That sounds good > to me, given that I'd like to go on vacation soon. Eric reminded me off-list that we'd like to at least add the lower level _interpreters API for

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 554 v4 (new interpreters module)

So you're okay with putting this off till (at least) 3.8? That sounds good to me, given that I'd like to go on vacation soon. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 7 December 2017 at 01:50, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Sorry to burst your

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 554 v4 (new interpreters module)

On 7 December 2017 at 01:50, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Sorry to burst your bubble, but I have not followed any of the discussion > and I am actually very worried about this topic. I don't think I will be > able to make time for this before the 3.7b1 feature freeze. I think that

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 554 v4 (new interpreters module)

Sorry to burst your bubble, but I have not followed any of the discussion and I am actually very worried about this topic. I don't think I will be able to make time for this before the 3.7b1 feature freeze. On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Eric Snow wrote: > Hi all,

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 554 v4 (new interpreters module)

On Dec 5, 2017 23:49, "Nick Coghlan" wrote: Nice updates! I like this version. Great! :) My one suggestion here would be to consider a dedicated exception type like "interpreters.SubinterpreterError", rather than re-using RuntimeError directly. That way you can put the

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 554 v4 (new interpreters module)

On 6 December 2017 at 12:51, Eric Snow wrote: > Hi all, > > I've finally updated PEP 554. Feedback would be most welcome. The > PEP is in a pretty good place now and I hope to we're close to a > decision to accept it. :) Nice updates! I like this version. > In

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 554 v4 (new interpreters module)

On 12/06/2017 03:51 AM, Eric Snow wrote: Hi all, I've finally updated PEP 554. Feedback would be most welcome. The PEP is in a pretty good place now and I hope to we're close to a decision to accept it. :) [...] C-extension opt-in/opt-out -- By using the

[Python-Dev] PEP 554 v4 (new interpreters module)

Hi all, I've finally updated PEP 554. Feedback would be most welcome. The PEP is in a pretty good place now and I hope to we're close to a decision to accept it. :) In addition to resolving the open questions, I've also made the following changes to the PEP: * put an API summary at the top