Hey David,
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:29 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:35 -0800, Collin Winter wrote:
[snip]
>> - How would you prefer to build the JIT-less package (current options:
>> via a ./configure flag; or by deleting _llvmjit.so from the
>> JIT-enabled package)?
>> - W
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:35 -0800, Collin Winter wrote:
> Hey packaging guys,
>
> We recently committed a change to Unladen Swallow [1] that moves all
> the JIT infrastructure into a Python extension module. The theory [2]
> behind this patch was that this would make it easier for downstream
> pac
Hey packaging guys,
We recently committed a change to Unladen Swallow [1] that moves all
the JIT infrastructure into a Python extension module. The theory [2]
behind this patch was that this would make it easier for downstream
packagers to ship a JIT-less Python package, with the JIT compiler
avai
