Re: [Python-Dev] Pep 550 module

2017-08-29 Thread Yury Selivanov
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Elvis Pranskevichus > wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 9:14:53 AM EDT Yury Selivanov wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Nick Coghlan >> wrote: >> > > Given the refocusing of the PEP on

Re: [Python-Dev] Pep 550 module

2017-08-29 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Elvis Pranskevichus wrote: > On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 9:14:53 AM EDT Yury Selivanov wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Nick Coghlan > wrote: > > > Given the refocusing of the PEP on the context variable API, with > > > the > > > other aspects introduc

Re: [Python-Dev] Pep 550 module

2017-08-29 Thread Elvis Pranskevichus
On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 9:14:53 AM EDT Yury Selivanov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > On 28 August 2017 at 01:51, Jim J. Jewett wrote: > >> I think there is general consensus that this should go in a module > >> other than sys. (At least a submodule.) > >>

Re: [Python-Dev] Pep 550 module

2017-08-29 Thread Yury Selivanov
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 28 August 2017 at 01:51, Jim J. Jewett wrote: >> I think there is general consensus that this should go in a module other >> than sys. (At least a submodule.) >> >> The specific names are still To Be Determined, but I suspect seeing the >>

Re: [Python-Dev] Pep 550 module

2017-08-29 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 28 August 2017 at 01:51, Jim J. Jewett wrote: > I think there is general consensus that this should go in a module other > than sys. (At least a submodule.) > > The specific names are still To Be Determined, but I suspect seeing the > functions and objects as part of a named module will affect

Re: [Python-Dev] Pep 550 module

2017-08-28 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Well, this talk may be a bit of bike-shedding, but +1 for a separate module/sub module And full -1 for something named "dynscopevars" That word is unreadable, barely mnemonic, but plain "ugly" - (I know that this is subjective, but it is just that :-) ) Why not just "execution_context" or "s

[Python-Dev] Pep 550 module

2017-08-27 Thread Jim J. Jewett
I think there is general consensus that this should go in a module other than sys. (At least a submodule.) The specific names are still To Be Determined, but I suspect seeing the functions and objects as part of a named module will affect what works. So I am requesting that the next iteration jus