On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Simon Cross
hodgestar+python...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
As an example of the last point, perhaps rather than modifying all the
*clients* of the socket module, it may make more sense to have tools
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com wrote:
On 3/24/2011 4:25 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
As an example of the last point, perhaps rather than modifying all the
*clients* of the socket module, it may make more sense to have tools
in the socket module itself to
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:10:08 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com
wrote:
On 3/24/2011 4:25 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
As an example of the last point, perhaps rather than modifying all the
*clients* of the
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
My model for the suggestion is the context objects in the decimal
module. They offer a constrained way to affect the way the entire
decimal module goes about its business, and through judicious use of
thread local
