Re: [Python-Dev] Proposed Python 3.0 schedule

2008-10-07 Thread Hrvoje Nikšić
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 11:30 +0200, Victor Stinner wrote: > > - I'd think "find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 python -c 'pass'" > > ought to work (with files with "bad" bytes being returned by find), > > First, fix your home directory :-) There are good tools (convmv?) to fix > invalid filenames.

Re: [Python-Dev] Proposed Python 3.0 schedule

2008-10-07 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, First of all, please read my document: http://wiki.python.org/moin/Python3UnicodeDecodeError I moved the document to a public wiki to allow anyone to edit it! Le Tuesday 07 October 2008 05:22:09 James Y Knight, vous avez écrit : > On Oct 6, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > > I'm

Re: [Python-Dev] Proposed Python 3.0 schedule

2008-10-06 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Oct 6, 2008, at 9:48 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote: [Barry Warsaw] So, we need to come up with a new release schedule for Python 3.0. My suggestion: 15-Oct-2008 3.0 beta 4 05-Nov-2008 3.0 rc 2 19-Nov-2008 3.0 rc 3 03-Dec-2008 3.0 final Given w

Re: [Python-Dev] Proposed Python 3.0 schedule

2008-10-06 Thread Raymond Hettinger
[Barry Warsaw] So, we need to come up with a new release schedule for Python 3.0. My suggestion: 15-Oct-2008 3.0 beta 4 05-Nov-2008 3.0 rc 2 19-Nov-2008 3.0 rc 3 03-Dec-2008 3.0 final Given what still needs to be done, is this a reasonable schedule? Do we need two more betas? Yes to bot

[Python-Dev] Proposed Python 3.0 schedule

2008-10-06 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So, we need to come up with a new release schedule for Python 3.0. My suggestion: 15-Oct-2008 3.0 beta 4 05-Nov-2008 3.0 rc 2 19-Nov-2008 3.0 rc 3 03-Dec-2008 3.0 final Given what still needs to be done, is this a reasonable schedule? Do we n