Christian Heimes wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> I do think that another (final) 3.0 alpha before PyCon would also be a
>> good idea. This way we can gel the release some more. For 2.6 I think
>> we'll need more alpha releases after PyCon; I doubt the backporting
>> from 3.0 (which has onl
Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
> Yes, I will. What are your time-lines? I've been targeting first week
> in March.
I like to port bytearray to 2.6 as early as possible. I'd be grateful if
you could port a limited subset of the new buffer protocol within the
next few weeks. bytearray needs:
PyBuffer
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I do think that another (final) 3.0 alpha before PyCon would also be a
> good idea. This way we can gel the release some more. For 2.6 I think
> we'll need more alpha releases after PyCon; I doubt the backporting
> from 3.0 (which has only started seriously quite recently)
On Jan 28, 2008 10:50 AM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the current thinking on this? Is the target still April 2008 as
> mentioned in PEP361? Are we going to have an alpha sometime soonish?
I would like to have an alpha before PyCon. It looks like there are
two release
What is the current thinking on this? Is the target still April 2008 as
mentioned in PEP361? Are we going to have an alpha sometime soonish?
Raymond
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
