On 11/27/06, Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006, Jason Orendorff wrote:
> > Way back on 11/22/06, "Martin v. L?wis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> [...] I can find nothing wrong with people relying on
> >> reference counting to close files, for example. It's a property of
> >>
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006, Jason Orendorff wrote:
> Way back on 11/22/06, "Martin v. L?wis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nick Coghlan schrieb:
>>> Martin v. L?wis wrote:
I personally consider it "good style" to rely on implementation details
of CPython;
>>>
>>> Is there a 'do not' missin
Way back on 11/22/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Coghlan schrieb:
> > Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> >> I personally consider it "good style" to rely on implementation details
> >> of CPython;
> >
> > Is there a 'do not' missing somewhere in there?
>
> No - I really mean it. I ca
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Nick Coghlan schrieb:
>> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>> I personally consider it "good style" to rely on implementation details
>>> of CPython;
>> Is there a 'do not' missing somewhere in there?
>
> No - I really mean it. I can find nothing wrong with people relying on
> refer
Nick Coghlan schrieb:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> I personally consider it "good style" to rely on implementation details
>> of CPython;
>
> Is there a 'do not' missing somewhere in there?
No - I really mean it. I can find nothing wrong with people relying on
reference counting to close files, fo
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> I personally consider it "good style" to rely on implementation details
> of CPython;
Is there a 'do not' missing somewhere in there?
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
