Currently, the readdir() call releases the GIL. I believe
this is not thread-safe, because readdir() does not need
to be re-entrant; we should use readdir_r where available
to get a thread-safe version.
Comments?
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
AFAIK readdir is only unsafe when multiple threads use the same DIR* at
the same time. The spec[1] seems to agree with me.
[1] : http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/readdir.html
What specific sentence makes you think so? I see
The readdir() interface
On 17-apr-2006, at 20:50, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
AFAIK readdir is only unsafe when multiple threads use the same
DIR* at
the same time. The spec[1] seems to agree with me.
[1] : http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/
readdir.html
What specific
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
A couple of lines down it says:
The pointer returned by readdir() points to data which may be
overwritten by another call to readdir() on the same directory
stream. This data is not overwritten by another call to readdir() on
a different directory stream.
This