Hi Nick,
On 16 May 2015 at 10:31, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, that's rather annoying that the PyPy team implemented bug-for-bug
compatibility there, and didn't follow up on the operand precedence
bug report to say that they had done so.
It's sadly not the only place, by far,
We have a similar experience -- Pyston runs into a similar issue with
sqlalchemy (with str() + foo calling foo.__radd__ before str.sq_concat)
and we are working to match CPython's behavior.
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Armin Rigo ar...@tunes.org wrote:
Hi Nick,
On 16 May 2015 at 10:31,
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 May 2015 at 07:35, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I expect you
On 16 May 2015 at 07:35, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I expect you can make something that behaves like list by defining __mul__
and
On 15 May 2015 at 10:45, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi all,
While attempting to clean up some of the more squamous aspects of
numpy's operator dispatch code [1][2], I've encountered a situation
where the semantics we want and are using are possible according to
On 15 May 2015 at 16:53, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I expect you can make something that behaves like list by defining __mul__
and __rmul__ and returning NotImplemented.
Hmm, it's fairly tricky, and part of
there could be kind of a pitfalls-page somewhere in the docs collecting
these things.
Best
Stefan
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Mai 2015 um 02:45 Uhr
Von: Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com
An: Python Dev python-dev@python.org
Betreff: [Python-Dev] Python-versus-CPython question for __mul__
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I expect you can make something that behaves like list by defining __mul__
and __rmul__ and returning NotImplemented.
Hmm, it's fairly tricky, and
Hi all,
While attempting to clean up some of the more squamous aspects of
numpy's operator dispatch code [1][2], I've encountered a situation
where the semantics we want and are using are possible according to
CPython-the-interpreter, but AFAICT ought not to be possible according
to
:45 Uhr
Von: Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com javascript:;
An: Python Dev python-dev@python.org javascript:;
Betreff: [Python-Dev] Python-versus-CPython question for __mul__ dispatch
Hi all,
While attempting to clean up some of the more squamous aspects of
numpy's operator dispatch code
in the docs collecting these
things.
Best
Stefan
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Mai 2015 um 02:45 Uhr
Von: Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com
An: Python Dev python-dev@python.org
Betreff: [Python-Dev] Python-versus-CPython question for __mul__ dispatch
Hi all,
While attempting to clean up some
11 matches
Mail list logo
