Well, it ought to be possible. I can turn off the instrumentation on the other
modules, and see what happens.
K
-Original Message-
From: Giovanni Bajo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12. október 2006 20:30
To: Kristján V. Jónsson
Cc: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: Python 2.5
Hello
there.
I just got round to
do some comparative runs of 2.5 32 bit Release, built with visual studio 2003
and 2005.
Here the figures
(pybench with default arguments)
.NET
2003:
Test
minimum average operation
From: Kristján V. Jónsson
I think we should start considering to make PCBuild8 a supported build.
+1 and not just for the free speed-up. VC8 is what more and more Windows
developers will have on there machines. Without a supported build, it becomes
much harder to make patches or build
Kristján V. Jónsson wrote:
This is an improvement of another 3.5 %.
In all, we have a performance increase of more than 10%.
Granted, this is from a single set of runs, but I think we should
start considering to make PCBuild8 a supported build.
Kristján, I wonder if the performance
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:00:09PM +0200, Martin v. L?wis wrote:
Kristj?n V. J?nsson schrieb:
This is an improvement of another 3.5 %.
In all, we have a performance increase of more than 10%.
Granted, this is from a single set of runs, but I think we should start
considering to make
On Friday 13 October 2006 07:00, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Kristján V. Jónsson schrieb:
This is an improvement of another 3.5 %.
In all, we have a performance increase of more than 10%.
Granted, this is from a single set of runs, but I think we should start
considering to make PCBuild8 a
Gregory P. Smith schrieb:
i read that as just suggesting that updates should be checked into the
release25-maint tree to get PCBuild8 working out of the box for anyone
who wants to build python from source with vs2005.
That's passive voice (should be checked). I think it is unrealistic
to
