-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
I would think that after 3.1 would be best to get any and all fixes
that go into 3.1.
That fits nicely with our general policy, so that the only difference
with 3.0 is that we won't do any securi
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:02, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> We made a decision at the sprints today about Python 3.0. We've agreed
>> that there will be one more release, 3.0.2 and then that's it. Because of
>> the earlier
Barry Warsaw wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We made a decision at the sprints today about Python 3.0. We've agreed
that there will be one more release, 3.0.2 and then that's it. Because
of the earlier decision to drop all support for Python 3.0 once 3.1 is
released, we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We made a decision at the sprints today about Python 3.0. We've
agreed that there will be one more release, 3.0.2 and then that's it.
Because of the earlier decision to drop all support for Python 3.0
once 3.1 is released, we won't be doing an
